Sino Agro Food Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sino Agro Food Inc (SIAF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Sino Agro Food Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 18M vs 55,711M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-41.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-5.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Sino Agro Food Inc generated 2.1% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs 16.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -107.6% net margin compares with 6.6% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Sino Agro Food Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $6.14M compares with $0.39M for the peer group (15.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SIAF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Sino Agro Food Inc reported revenue growth of 2.05 % year on year in Q1 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 15.95 %.
With a net margin of -107.59 %, Sino Agro Food Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (6.59 %).
Sino Agro Food Inc generated 0.02 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.02 % a year earlier.
Sino Agro Food Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sino Agro Food Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sino Agro Food Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 2.1% for Sino Agro Food Inc. Sino Agro Food Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 16.70 % (1 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SIAF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SIAF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alico Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Tyson Foods Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sino Agro Food Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Sino Agro Food Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | 0.02 | 18.43 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087.25 | 55,694.00 |
| Alico Inc | 291.16 | 17.07 |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | 22.92 | 164.08 |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | 0.23 | 0.20 |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | - | - |
| SUBTOTAL | 18,401.58 | 55,893.78 |
Sources: Sino Agro Food Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sino Agro Food Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Tyson Foods Inc | Beef 37.15 % |
| Alico Inc | Alico Citrus 93.03 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sino Agro Food Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | 0 | 6,142,711 | -33,692,113 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087 | 418,752 | 4,496 |
| Alico Inc | 291 | 853,450 | 37,700 |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | 23 | 99,444 | -1,446 |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | 0 | 11,929 | -631,040 |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | - | - | -1,126 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 18,402 | 386,181 | 3,970 |
Sino Agro Food Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Agricultural Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (58 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.37 % | 21.12 % (avg) | +45.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 17.29 % | industry median | +61.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -460.12 % | 2.16 % (avg) | -462.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 4.73 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Agricultural Production industry average (58 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 20.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 9.8x | - |
| P/B | 0.0x | 1.7x | -1.7x |
| Return on Equity | -24.87 % | industry aggregate | -37.80 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.36 % | 1.23 % (avg) | -0.87 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 225.92 % | -30.51 % | -20.07 % | -42.22 % | -28.51 % | -4.29 % | -92.03 % |
| Operating Margin | 18.79 % | 21.56 % | 19.46 % | -0.08 % | 4.28 % | 5.28 % | -2.33 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 13.56 % | 7.83 % | 4.74 % | -0.01 % | 0.40 % | 0.49 % | -0.03 % |
| P/E | - | 2.4x | 0.8x | - | 0.3x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Sino Agro Food Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Sino Agro Food Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Sino Agro Food Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Sino Agro Food Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 61.0 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 37.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-41.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (60.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-5.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | 0.01 | 3.80 | 0.01 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 0.15 | 1.58 | 0.57 |
| Alico Inc | 7.45 | 9.11 | 0.78 |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | 0.08 | 0.99 | 9.31 |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | 8.78 | 12.08 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | Q1 2022 | - | - |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.1 % | +169.6 % |
| Alico Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.7 % | - |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | Q3 2019 | +88.1 % | - |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | Q2 2025 | 0.0 % | - |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.1 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sino Agro Food Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | Q1 2022 | -98.1 % | - |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.6 % | -30.0 % |
| Alico Inc | Q2 2026 | -86.3 % | -10.9 % |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | Q3 2019 | +10.0 % | - |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | Q2 2025 | -0.1 % | - |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Sino Agro Food Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | - | - | - |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 1.66% | 1.98% | 3.28% |
| Alico Inc | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.70% |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | - | - | - |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | - | - | - |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Sino Agro Food Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sino Agro Food Inc | - | 0.00 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 31.43 | 0.32 |
| Alico Inc | 176.72 | 17.06 |
| Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. | - | 0.14 |
| Naturalshrimp Incorporated | - | 1.15 |
| U S Premium Beef Llc | - | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 38.88 | 0.33 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.