Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated (JLL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 27,434M vs 86,507M combined for tracked competitors (24.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+4.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated generated 10.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 14.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 3.1% net margin compares with 3.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated ranks #6 of 75 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Operations industry, holding 4.6% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated accounted for 23.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 24.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.24M compares with $0.24M for the peer group (1.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
JLL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated reported revenue growth of 10.84 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 14.30 %.
With a net margin of 3.09 %, Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated reported lower profitability than its competitors (3.81 %).
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated generated 23.53 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 24.09 % a year earlier.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 10.9% year over year, combined, vs 10.8% for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated. Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's share of combined industry revenue moved from 6.70% to 6.70%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
JLL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
JLL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
JLL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
JLL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kennedy wilson Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Emcor Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Rmr Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Abm Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Cbre Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,739.14 | 27,433.50 |
| Cbre Group Inc | 38,304.60 | 43,639.00 |
| Emcor Group Inc | 34,106.13 | 18,598.34 |
| Firstservice Corporation | 5,903.21 | 5,497.50 |
| Colliers International Group Inc | 4,592.91 | 5,558.46 |
| Newmark Group Inc | 3,145.77 | 3,604.36 |
| SUBTOTAL | 108,332.73 | 125,486.31 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
Sources: Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Newmark Group Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cbre Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Colliers International Group Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cushman and Wakefield Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Emcor Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Savills plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Real Estate Management Services 79.32 % |
| Cbre Group Inc | Building Operations & Experience 59.56 % |
| Newmark Group Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Abm Industries Inc | Business and Industry 47.47 % |
| Cushman and Wakefield Ltd | Americas 72.13 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,739 | 242,774 | 8,831 |
| Cbre Group Inc | 38,305 | 281,542 | 9,265 |
| Emcor Group Inc | 34,106 | 422,690 | 32,708 |
| Firstservice Corporation | 5,903 | 219,900 | 7,630 |
| Colliers International Group Inc | 4,593 | 351,801 | 14,212 |
| Newmark Group Inc | 3,146 | 514,908 | 25,988 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 93,594 | 236,831 | 9,390 |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Cbre Group Inc | United States 57.01 % |
| Newmark Group Inc | United States 87.30 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 68 companies in Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated ranks #6 of 68 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 4.57 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,411, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Airbnb Inc | 92,326 | 28.70 % |
| 2 | Ke Holdings inc | 58,348 | 18.14 % |
| 3 | Cbre Group Inc | 37,974 | 11.81 % |
| 4 | Api Group Corporation | 16,694 | 5.19 % |
| 5 | Invitation Homes Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,711 | 4.57 % |
| 7 | Rollins Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Terreno Realty Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Brookfield Property Partners L p | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Firstservice Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Airbnb Inc | 92,326 | 27.02 % |
| 2 | Ke Holdings inc | 58,348 | -13.15 % |
| 3 | Cbre Group Inc | 37,974 | -17.32 % |
| 4 | Api Group Corporation | 16,694 | 12.81 % |
| 5 | Invitation Homes Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,711 | 4.25 % |
| 7 | Rollins Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Terreno Realty Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Brookfield Property Partners L p | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Firstservice Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Frontdoor Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Operations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (71 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 52.77 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | 4.65 % | industry median | +0.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.31 % | 16.25 % (avg) | -9.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.88 % | 17.17 % (avg) | -16.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Operations industry average (71 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9x | 31.1x | -16.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.0x | 15.2x | -6.2x |
| P/B | 2.0x | 3.1x | -1.1x |
| Return on Equity | 13.33 % | industry aggregate | 5.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.08 % | 2.12 % (avg) | 4.96 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 105.72 % | 10.20 % | -7.75 % | 16.74 % | 7.72 % | -0.49 % | 12.87 % | 11.45 % |
| Operating Margin | 4.33 % | 3.98 % | 3.37 % | 5.39 % | 4.16 % | 2.78 % | 3.70 % | 4.20 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.92 % | 6.10 % | 4.11 % | 7.05 % | 5.40 % | 3.51 % | 5.16 % | 6.24 % |
| P/E | 12.9x | 15.9x | 18.6x | 13.9x | 12.3x | 36.1x | 23.5x | 20.2x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.16x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,411 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.88 % vs industry average 17.17 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 5.8 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.16x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (14.9x vs 31.1x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 0.07 | 1.11 | 0.20 |
| Cbre Group Inc | 0.16 | 1.11 | 0.64 |
| Emcor Group Inc | 0.19 | 1.24 | - |
| Firstservice Corporation | 0.20 | 1.70 | 1.57 |
| Colliers International Group Inc | 0.16 | 1.10 | 1.77 |
| Newmark Group Inc | 0.17 | 1.06 | 1.09 |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +10.8 % | +93.9 % |
| Cbre Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | +3.3 % |
| Emcor Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.8 % | +33.6 % |
| Firstservice Corporation | Q4 2025 | +5.4 % | +1.6 % |
| Colliers International Group Inc | Q4 2025 | +15.3 % | -5.2 % |
| Newmark Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.0 % | -20.7 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +12.5 % | +39.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Q2 2026 | - | +12.8 % |
| Cbre Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | - |
| Emcor Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.1 % | +11.1 % |
| Firstservice Corporation | Q4 2025 | +4.4 % | +13.2 % |
| Colliers International Group Inc | Q4 2025 | +14.9 % | +20.9 % |
| Newmark Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +219.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 5.68% | 9.47% | 13.33% |
| Cbre Group Inc | 4.78% | 7.81% | 16.11% |
| Emcor Group Inc | 15.31% | 21.54% | 38.48% |
| Firstservice Corporation | 4.45% | 4.18% | 13.86% |
| Colliers International Group Inc | 3.31% | 4.65% | 14.64% |
| Newmark Group Inc | 3.47% | 5.04% | 10.73% |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 15.07 | 0.54 |
| Cbre Group Inc | 29.97 | 0.88 |
| Emcor Group Inc | 23.85 | 1.83 |
| Firstservice Corporation | 40.70 | 1.07 |
| Colliers International Group Inc | 44.51 | 0.83 |
| Newmark Group Inc | 15.81 | 0.87 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 22.17 | 0.86 |
Sign in to see all peers for Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.