Fednat Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fednat Holding (FNHC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Fednat Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 235M vs 880,975M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-28.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-26.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Fednat Holding generated -19.9% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs 3.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -104.0% net margin compares with 9.1% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Fednat Holding accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.79M compares with $1.18M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FNHC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Fednat Holding reported revenue contraction of 19.93 % year on year in Q1 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 3.26 %.
With a net margin of -103.98 %, Fednat Holding reported lower profitability than its competitors (9.06 %).
Fednat Holding generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
Fednat Holding vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Fednat Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Fednat Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Property & Casualty Insurance industry grew revenue 5.6% year over year, combined, vs -19.9% for Fednat Holding. Fednat Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Fednat Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (46) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FNHC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
FNHC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
FNHC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Fire Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Universal Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Safety Insurance Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Heritage Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Kingstone Companies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fednat Holding's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Fednat Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
In Florida, more than 50 companies compete with us in the homeowners’ insurance market. Three of our larger competitors are Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (“Citizens”), Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Security Insurance Company. In Florida, more than one dozen companies compete with us in the commercial general liability insurance market.
Significant competition also emerged because of fundamental changes made to the property and casualty insurance business in Florida in recent years which resulted in a multi-pronged approach to address the cost of residential property insurance in Florida. First, the law increased the capacity of reinsurance that stabilized the reinsurance market to the benefit of the insurance companies writing properties lines in Florida. Secondly, the law provided for rate relief to all policyholders. The law also authorized the state-owned insurance company, Citizens, which is free of many of the restraints on private carriers such as surplus, ratios, income taxes and reinsurance expense, to reduce its premium rates and begin competing against private insurers in the residential property insurance market and expands the authority of Citizens to write commercial insurance.
Publicly Traded Peers of Fednat holding company
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | 0.17 | 235.04 |
| Progressive Corp | 122,372.37 | 91,055.00 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 77,570.98 | 48,979.00 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,985.96 | 79,403.00 |
| Allstate Corp | 58,958.21 | 70,137.00 |
| American International Group Inc | 38,833.55 | 26,636.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 603,253.07 | 887,215.15 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Fednat holding company.
Sources: Fednat holding company's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Fednat holding company versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Fednat Holding's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Citizens | Named by the company | 85% |
| Heritage Property and Casualty Insurance Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fednat Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Fednat Holding's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Travelers Companies inc | Business Insurance 45.68 % |
| Metlife Inc | Group Benefits 36.13 % |
| Allstate Corp | Allstate Protection 87.37 % |
| American International Group Inc | North America Operating 30.08 % |
| The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | P&C Business Insurance 55.32 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
Fednat Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | 0 | 791,367 | -429,741 |
| Progressive Corp | 122,372 | 1,821,100 | 233,900 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 77,571 | 1,440,559 | 243,765 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,986 | 1,726,152 | 79,543 |
| Allstate Corp | 58,958 | 1,308,526 | 248,134 |
| American International Group Inc | 38,834 | 1,205,249 | 134,208 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 603,253 | 1,184,526 | 203,010 |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
Fednat Holding's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Brown and Brown Inc | US 86.46 % |
| Ncr Atleos Corporation | United States 47.84 % |
| Leaf Group Ltd | US 87.97 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Fednat Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Property & Casualty Insurance industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (75 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -3.61 % | 49.36 % (avg) | -53.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | -48.64 % | industry median | -54.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -49.37 % | 13.82 % (avg) | -63.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.73 % | 0.95 % (avg) | -0.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Fednat Holding's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Property & Casualty Insurance industry average (75 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 13.2x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 6.2x | - |
| P/B | 0.3x | 1.9x | -1.6x |
| Return on Equity | -209.96 % | industry aggregate | -225.12 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -17.89 % | 5.86 % (avg) | -23.75 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Fednat Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 64.86 % | 24.52 % | 26.61 % | 23.79 % | 1.09 % | 4.80 % | 4.07 % | -43.14 % |
| Operating Margin | 28.55 % | 27.85 % | -23.23 % | 2.37 % | 12.31 % | 2.77 % | -24.08 % | -38.29 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 10.42 % | 8.78 % | -8.53 % | 1.10 % | 6.12 % | 1.25 % | -11.14 % | -13.16 % |
| P/E | - | 9.7x | - | 25.2x | 9.0x | 154.7x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Fednat Holding's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Fednat Holding's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Fednat Holding is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Fednat Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.73 % vs industry average 0.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Fednat Holding's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Fednat Holding's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Fednat Holding's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Fednat Holding falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Fednat Holding's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 54.2 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 225.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-28.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-26.3% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Fednat Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | 0.12 | 0.52 | 1.95 |
| Progressive Corp | 0.06 | 1.06 | 0.23 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.28 |
| Metlife Inc | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.70 |
| Allstate Corp | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| American International Group Inc | 0.04 | 1.44 | 0.17 |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Fednat Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | Q1 2022 | -19.9 % | - |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +7.3 % | +4.3 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q2 2026 | +0.3 % | +45.3 % |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +6.0 % |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +11.8 % | +55.8 % |
| American International Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.1 % | -17.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.8 % | +56.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Fednat Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | Q1 2022 | - | -71.3 % |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +1,027.3 % | +35.3 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q2 2026 | -0.9 % | - |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +1,959.3 % | - |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | - |
| American International Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
Fednat Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | - | - | - |
| Progressive Corp | 9.51% | 11.22% | 35.40% |
| Travelers Companies inc | 5.78% | 10.84% | 25.58% |
| Metlife Inc | 0.49% | 0.77% | 12.93% |
| Allstate Corp | 10.88% | 16.50% | 43.12% |
| American International Group Inc | 1.83% | 2.10% | 7.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Fednat Holding's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Fednat holding company | - | 0.00 |
| Progressive Corp | 10.51 | 1.34 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 9.72 | 1.58 |
| Metlife Inc | 18.39 | 0.78 |
| Allstate Corp | 4.56 | 0.84 |
| American International Group Inc | 13.45 | 1.46 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 3.97 | 0.68 |
Sign in to see all peers for Fednat holding company.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.