Curtiss Wright's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Curtiss Wright (CW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Curtiss Wright vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,653M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Curtiss Wright ranks #13 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.9% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Curtiss Wright accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Curtiss Wright generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs 5.5% for Curtiss Wright. Curtiss Wright's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.71% to 0.67%, a loss of 0.04 percentage points.
Curtiss Wright's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtiss wright Corporation | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Curtiss Wright's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Curtiss Wright's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Curtiss-Wright | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Curtiss Wright's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Curtiss Wright's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Curtiss wright Corporation | Naval & Power 44.07 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).