Continental Materials's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Continental Materials (CUO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Continental Materials vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 122M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Continental Materials accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CUO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2020
Continental Materials generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 36.9% for Continental Materials. Continental Materials's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.04%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Continental Materials's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental Materials Corporation | No | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (11) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CUO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CUO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CUO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Continental Materials's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Voxx International Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aptiv Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| SEVCQ | Named by the company | 85% |
| Visteon Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Strattec Security Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Standard Motor Products Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Via Optronics Ag | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mobileye Global inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Uniroyal Global Engineered Products Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Helios Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sono Group N v | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lear Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Continental Materials's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.