Bryn Mawr Bank's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bryn Mawr Bank (BMTC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Bryn Mawr Bank vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 236M vs 870,292M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-24.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Bryn Mawr Bank generated 15.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2021, vs 9.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 30.1% net margin compares with 31.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Bryn Mawr Bank accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.48M compares with $0.51M for the peer group (1.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BMTC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2021
Bryn Mawr Bank reported revenue growth of 15.56 % year on year in Q3 2021, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.22 %.
With a net margin of 30.10 %, Bryn Mawr Bank reported lower profitability than its competitors (31.03 %).
Bryn Mawr Bank generated 0.04 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
Bryn Mawr Bank vs. its Competitors, Q3 2021
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Bryn Mawr Bank and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Bryn Mawr Bank's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Regional Banks industry grew revenue -15.0% year over year, combined, vs 15.6% for Bryn Mawr Bank. Bryn Mawr Bank's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.05%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (219) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BMTC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BMTC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Old Point Financial Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Optimumbank Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Community Ban corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Bank Of The James Financial Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bryn Mawr Bank's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The markets in which the Corporation competes are highly competitive. The Corporation’s direct competition in attracting business is mainly from commercial banks, investment management companies, savings and loan associations, trust companies and insurance agencies. The Corporation also competes with credit unions, on-line banking enterprises, consumer finance companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, stock brokerage companies, investment advisory companies and other entities providing one or more of the services and products offered by the Corporation.
The Corporation is able to compete with the other firms because of its consistent level of customer service, excellent reputation, professional expertise, full product line, and its competitive rates and fees. However, there are several negative factors which can hinder the Corporation’s ability to compete with large institutions such as its limited number of locations, smaller advertising budget, lower technology budget, inability to spread out fixed costs and other lack-of-scale-type disadvantages.
The acquisition of Lau Associates in July 2008 and the formation of BMTC-DE allowed the Corporation to establish a presence in the State of Delaware, where it competes for wealth management business. The November 2012 acquisition of certain loan and deposit accounts and a branch location from First Bank of Delaware enabled the Corporation to further expand its banking segment in the state of Delaware by establishing a full-service branch along the Route 202 corridor.
Publicly Traded Peers of Bryn Mawr Bank Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | 902.99 | 235.80 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,840.78 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609.27 | 121,098.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,473.80 | 83,940.00 |
| Citigroup inc | 233,259.84 | 88,262.00 |
| Capital one financial corp | 122,021.31 | 51,099.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,897,035.14 | 877,287.19 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Sources: Bryn Mawr Bank Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Bryn Mawr Bank Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Delaware. The Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Bryn Mawr Bank's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| D r Horton Inc | HomeBuildingOps 94.14 % |
| First Citizens Bancshares Inc | Commercial Bank 46.42 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Florida 26.99 % |
| Lennar Corp | Homebuilding West 34.85 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | 903 | 483,205 | 147,963 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,841 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,474 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| Citigroup inc | 233,260 | 390,540 | 72,049 |
| Capital one financial corp | 122,021 | 669,712 | 137,615 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,896,132 | 505,482 | 132,657 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Lionsgate Studios Corp | UNITED STATES 64.70 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Regional Banks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (130 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 69.20 % | 64.14 % (avg) | +5.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 38.23 % | industry median | -2.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 44.86 % | 49.90 % (avg) | -5.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.58 % | 3.18 % (avg) | -2.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Regional Banks industry average (130 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.9x | 15.6x | -3.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.5x | 6.2x | +3.3x |
| P/B | 1.4x | 1.3x | +0.1x |
| Return on Equity | 11.35 % | industry aggregate | -1.18 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.67 % | 3.20 % (avg) | 2.47 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 9.94 % | 5.52 % | 22.07 % | 2.81 % | 10.06 % | 27.16 % | 1.40 % | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | 33.35 % | 35.72 % | 33.80 % | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | - | - | 5.19 % | 5.79 % | 4.98 % | - |
| P/E | - | - | 31.2x | 18.2x | 32.8x | 11.9x | 13.5x | 19.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Bryn Mawr Bank's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Bryn Mawr Bank is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.58 % vs industry average 3.18 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Bryn Mawr Bank's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Bryn Mawr Bank's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Bryn Mawr Bank falls in the High attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Bryn Mawr Bank's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 12.3% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (11.9x vs 15.6x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-24.1% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.27 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
| Citigroup inc | 0.01 | 0.40 | 1.75 |
| Capital one financial corp | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.39 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | Q3 2021 | +15.6 % | +39.1 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | +14.1 % | +44.6 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | +1,392.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +24.2 % | +55.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | Q3 2021 | - | -86.9 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | - | -6.7 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | -73.8 % | -8.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Bryn Mawr Bank's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | 1.43% | 7.57% | 11.35% |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
| Citigroup inc | 0.61% | 0.63% | 7.62% |
| Capital one financial corp | 1.56% | 3.24% | 9.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Bryn Mawr Bank's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | 12.47 | 3.83 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.17 | 4.87 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.78 | 3.34 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.82 | 2.96 |
| Citigroup inc | 16.34 | 2.64 |
| Capital one financial corp | 11.69 | 2.39 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 12.58 | 3.30 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.