Trane Technologies Plc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Trane Technologies Plc (TT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Trane Technologies Plc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 22,210M vs 659,706M combined for tracked competitors (3.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Trane Technologies Plc generated 10.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 10.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 14.7% net margin compares with 19.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Trane Technologies Plc ranks #2 of 38 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, holding 19.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Trane Technologies Plc accounted for 3.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 3.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.50M compares with $0.55M for the peer group (0.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Trane Technologies Plc reported revenue growth of 10.56 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.05 %.
With a net margin of 14.72 %, Trane Technologies Plc reported lower profitability than its competitors (19.86 %).
Trane Technologies Plc generated 3.51 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 3.49 % a year earlier.
Trane Technologies Plc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Trane Technologies Plc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Trane Technologies Plc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry grew revenue 9.7% year over year, combined, vs 10.6% for Trane Technologies Plc. Trane Technologies Plc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 8.15% to 8.21%, a gain of 0.06 percentage points.
Trane Technologies Plc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (35) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Manitowoc Company Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Modine Manufacturing Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | National Presto Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Cummins Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Trane Technologies Plc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Trane Technologies Plc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Trane Technologies Plc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583.35 | 22,209.90 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| Danaher Corporation | 160,858.71 | 25,107.00 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199.36 | 21,499.00 |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | 91,418.46 | 24,433.00 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 89,433.73 | 18,637.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,204,281.32 | 713,623.59 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Trane Technologies Plc.
Sources: Trane Technologies Plc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Trane Technologies Plc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Trane Technologies Plc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson Controls International Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aaon Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lennox International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Emcor Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Airjoule Technologies Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| XPDBU | Named by the company | 85% |
| Carrier Global Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Evoair Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Core and Main Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Trane Technologies Plc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Trane Technologies Plc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Diagnostics 39.36 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Diversified Industrial 66.93 % |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | Americas 66.79 % |
| Emerson Electric Co | Safety and Productivity 11.33 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Trane Technologies Plc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583 | 504,770 | 67,557 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| Danaher Corporation | 160,859 | 418,450 | 66,733 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | 91,418 | 108,591 | 16,342 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 89,434 | 255,301 | 35,329 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,103,698 | 552,286 | 97,102 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Trane Technologies Plc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | Americas 80.46 % |
| Danaher Corporation | North America 39.49 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | North America 67.21 % |
| Cummins Inc | United States 56.10 % |
| Dover Corp | United States 55.59 % |
| Stanley Black and Decker Inc | United States 60.90 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Trane Technologies Plc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 35 companies in Trane Technologies Plc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Trane Technologies Plc ranks #2 of 35 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 19.26 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,736, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abb Ltd | 179,867 | 34.45 % |
| 2 | Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583 | 19.26 % |
| 3 | Ferguson Enterprises Inc | 44,096 | 8.45 % |
| 4 | Xylem Inc | 23,873 | 4.57 % |
| 5 | Amcor Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Snap on Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Itt Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Idex Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Stanley Black and Decker Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Graco Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Trane Technologies Plc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Trane Technologies Plc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abb Ltd | 179,867 | 35.57 % |
| 2 | Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583 | 11.84 % |
| 3 | Ferguson Enterprises Inc | 44,096 | -0.83 % |
| 4 | Xylem Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Amcor Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Snap on Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Itt Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Trane Technologies Plc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Trane Technologies Plc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (50 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.23 % | 31.31 % (avg) | +22.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | 17.94 % | industry median | +8.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.88 % | 5.28 % (avg) | +6.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.49 % | 4.37 % (avg) | -2.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Trane Technologies Plc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry average (50 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 35.6x | 23.7x | +11.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.2x | 15.2x | +26.0x |
| P/B | 12.2x | 3.1x | +9.2x |
| Return on Equity | 34.76 % | industry aggregate | 18.90 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 16.39 % | 2.26 % (avg) | 14.13 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Trane Technologies Plc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 15.20 % | 1.49 % | - | 13.50 % | 13.12 % | 10.54 % | 12.22 % | 7.48 % |
| Operating Margin | 12.54 % | 12.16 % | 12.31 % | 14.31 % | 15.13 % | 16.37 % | 17.64 % | 18.61 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 9.79 % | 8.89 % | 7.76 % | 10.08 % | 13.17 % | 14.56 % | 16.61 % | 17.23 % |
| P/E | 13.2x | 17.7x | 41.3x | 32.4x | 23.1x | 26.8x | 35.0x | 31.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Trane Technologies Plc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Trane Technologies Plc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Trane Technologies Plc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Trane Technologies Plc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Trane Technologies Plc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Trane Technologies Plc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.56x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 4.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Trane Technologies Plc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,736 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.49 % vs industry average 4.37 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Trane Technologies Plc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Trane Technologies Plc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Trane Technologies Plc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Trane Technologies Plc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Trane Technologies Plc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 8.2 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 18.9 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Trane Technologies Plc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | 0.06 | 1.15 | 0.54 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| Danaher Corporation | - | 1.73 | 0.40 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.65 |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | 0.05 | 0.96 | 0.70 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 0.05 | 0.88 | 0.65 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trane Technologies Plc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | Q2 2026 | +10.6 % | +6.4 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +56.8 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +18.2 % |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | Q1 2026 | +8.2 % | +17.1 % |
| Emerson Electric Co | Q2 2026 | +7.0 % | +22.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.1 % | +67.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trane Technologies Plc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | -15.0 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.0 % | +8.5 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | +32.2 % |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | Q1 2026 | +7.6 % | - |
| Emerson Electric Co | Q2 2026 | +2.7 % | +9.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
Trane Technologies Plc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | 13.29% | 18.86% | 34.76% |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| Danaher Corporation | 4.72% | 5.44% | 7.66% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 11.99% | 15.10% | 25.38% |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | 9.33% | 15.77% | 26.03% |
| Emerson Electric Co | 6.13% | 8.71% | 12.69% |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Trane Technologies Plc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Trane Technologies Plc | 34.27 | 4.53 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| Danaher Corporation | 40.45 | 6.41 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 34.06 | 5.78 |
| Johnson Controls International Plc | 27.02 | 3.74 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 34.88 | 4.80 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 9.67 | 1.69 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trane Technologies Plc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.