Site Centers's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Site Centers (SITC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Site Centers vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 71M vs 8,451M combined for tracked competitors (0.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-40.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-11.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Site Centers generated -68.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -12.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -12.2% net margin compares with 18.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Site Centers ranks #148 of 189 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Site Centers accounted for 0.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 1.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.46M compares with $2.06M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SITC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Site Centers reported revenue contraction of 68.05 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -12.09 %.
With a net margin of -12.19 %, Site Centers reported lower profitability than its competitors (18.49 %).
Site Centers generated 0.57 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 1.54 % a year earlier.
Site Centers vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Site Centers and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Site Centers's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -0.8% year over year, combined, vs -68.1% for Site Centers. Site Centers's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.05% to 0.01%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Site Centers's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SITC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SITC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
SITC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whitestone Reit | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Simon Property Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Federal Realty Investment Trust | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Phillips Edison and Company Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Kimco Realty Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Site Centers's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Site Centers Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | 160.05 | 71.27 |
| Simon Property Group inc | 66,464.36 | 6,648.59 |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | 15,133.98 | 2,161.51 |
| Bxp Inc | 9,965.64 | 3,525.68 |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 9,518.09 | 1,310.91 |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | 8,621.76 | 2,461.07 |
| SUBTOTAL | 122,850.21 | 20,615.30 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Site Centers Corp .
Sources: Site Centers Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Site Centers Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Site Centers's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Vornado Realty Trust | New York 82.22 % |
| Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Site Centers's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | 160 | 459,774 | 825,200 |
| Simon Property Group inc | 66,464 | 1,846,829 | 1,515,221 |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | 15,134 | 3,275,012 | 946,445 |
| Bxp Inc | 9,966 | 4,268,383 | 500,507 |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 9,518 | 4,096,578 | 1,619,188 |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | 8,622 | 5,304,026 | 932,739 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 122,690 | 2,063,483 | 909,666 |
Site Centers's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 182 companies in Site Centers's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Site Centers ranks #148 of 182 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.01 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 417, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welltower Inc | 169,907 | 11.84 % |
| 2 | Prologis Inc | 127,892 | 8.91 % |
| 3 | Equinix Inc | 101,514 | 7.07 % |
| 4 | American Tower Corporation | 78,673 | 5.48 % |
| 5 | Simon Property Group inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Realty Income Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Public Storage | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ventas inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Iron Mountain Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 148 | Site Centers Corp | 160 | 0.01 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Site Centers's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Site Centers's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | Ready Capital Corporation | 228 | -68.19 % |
| 144 | Tpg Mortgage Investment Trust Inc | 192 | -21.05 % |
| 145 | Rreef Property Trust Inc | 185 | - |
| 146 | Strawberry Fields Reit Inc | 180 | 9.88 % |
| 147 | Seven Hills Realty Trust | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 148 | Site Centers Corp | 160 | -65.06 % |
| 149 | First Real Estate Investment Trust Of New Jersey Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 150 | Elme Communities | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 151 | Net Lease Office Properties | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 152 | Orion Properties Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 153 | Braemar Hotels and Resorts Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Site Centers's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Site Centers's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (194 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 71.22 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -218.06 % | industry median | -246.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 211.82 % | 37.42 % (avg) | +174.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 18.43 % | 23.97 % (avg) | -5.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Site Centers's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry average (194 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 2.0x | 33.2x | -31.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.0x | 17.6x | -16.7x |
| P/B | 0.8x | 2.0x | -1.2x |
| Return on Equity | 40.56 % | industry aggregate | 34.61 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -21.43 % | 1.99 % (avg) | -23.42 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Site Centers's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -7.53 % | -53.92 % | 18.53 % | -9.38 % | 7.06 % | -1.10 % | -49.21 % | -55.44 % |
| Operating Margin | -11.11 % | 16.92 % | 27.85 % | 20.24 % | 23.49 % | 21.46 % | 10.36 % | -93.51 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.97 % | 0.94 % | 2.22 % | 1.28 % | 1.62 % | 1.47 % | 0.50 % | -10.68 % |
| P/E | - | - | 12.6x | 147.9x | 4.5x | 9.3x | 1.6x | 2.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Site Centers's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Site Centers's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Site Centers is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Site Centers's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Site Centers's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Site Centers falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 1.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Site Centers's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 417 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 18.43 % vs industry average 23.97 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Site Centers's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Site Centers's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Site Centers's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Site Centers falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Site Centers's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 34.6 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 246.1 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-40.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-11.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Site Centers's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | 3.38 | 3.63 | 0.20 |
| Simon Property Group inc | 481.01 | 876.45 | 5.95 |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | - | 1.62 | 0.11 |
| Bxp Inc | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.45 |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 0.60 | 1.75 | 0.60 |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | 0.48 | 1.23 | 0.44 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Site Centers's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | Q2 2026 | -68.1 % | - |
| Simon Property Group inc | Q1 2026 | +19.3 % | +19.0 % |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | Q1 2026 | +4.0 % | +23.7 % |
| Bxp Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.1 % | -14.0 % |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | Q1 2026 | +10.3 % | +141.9 % |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -47.9 % | -13.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.2 % | +5.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Site Centers's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | Q2 2026 | - | -35.4 % |
| Simon Property Group inc | Q1 2026 | +24.8 % | -9.5 % |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | Q1 2026 | - | - |
| Bxp Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.2 % | +13.1 % |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | Q1 2026 | - | -45.4 % |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +67.2 % |
Site Centers's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | 27.81% | 31.22% | 40.56% |
| Simon Property Group inc | 14.83% | 12.17% | 120.40% |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | 3.16% | 2.03% | 5.89% |
| Bxp Inc | 1.61% | 1.44% | 5.40% |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 5.80% | 3.83% | 15.58% |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | 4.77% | 5.11% | 14.39% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Site Centers's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Site Centers Corp | 1.26 | 2.25 |
| Simon Property Group inc | 14.22 | 10.00 |
| Kimco Realty Corporation | 25.86 | 7.00 |
| Bxp Inc | 33.56 | 2.83 |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust | 19.07 | 7.26 |
| Brixmor Property Group Inc | 20.03 | 3.50 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.38 | 5.96 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.