Reserve Petroleum Co's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Reserve Petroleum Co (RSRV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Reserve Petroleum Co vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 27M vs 1,040,286M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+68.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+17.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Reserve Petroleum Co generated 226.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 41.7% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 22.3% net margin compares with 17.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Reserve Petroleum Co ranks #99 of 133 companies by market capitalization in the Oil And Gas Production industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Reserve Petroleum Co accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $3.38M compares with $5.46M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RSRV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Reserve Petroleum Co reported revenue growth of 226.38 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 41.65 %.
With a net margin of 22.33 %, Reserve Petroleum Co achieved higher profitability than its competitors (17.80 %).
Reserve Petroleum Co generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Reserve Petroleum Co vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Reserve Petroleum Co reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Reserve Petroleum Co and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Reserve Petroleum Co's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.2% year over year, combined, vs 226.4% for Reserve Petroleum Co. Reserve Petroleum Co's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (90) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RSRV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RSRV Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
RSRV Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharkninja Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Laredo Oil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Calumet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Apa Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Reserve Petroleum Co's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The Company does not operate any of the wells in which we have an interest; rather, we partner with companies that have the resources, staff, and experience to operate wells both in the drilling and production phases. The Company uses its strong financial base and its mineral and leasehold acreage ownership, along with its own geologic and economic evaluations, to participate in drilling operations with these companies. This methodology allows us to participate in exploration and development activities we could not undertake on our own due to financial and personnel limits and allows us to maintain low overhead costs.
Publicly Traded Peers of Reserve Petroleum Co
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Reserve Petroleum Co |
33.65 | 27.06 |
 Exxon Mobil Corporation |
668,775.60 | 396,627.00 |
 Chevron Corp |
407,773.88 | 233,333.00 |
 Shell Plc |
288,358.39 | 266,886.00 |
 Totalenergies Se |
191,686.08 | 162,863.00 |
 Conocophillips |
158,547.65 | 67,749.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,570,810.99 | 1,789,834.43 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Reserve Petroleum Co.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Reserve Petroleum Co versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Williams companies inc | Transmission, Power & Gulf 47.62 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | United States of America 98.40 % |
| Imperial Oil Limited | Upstream 43.74 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Oil and gas 98.04 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | 34 | 3,382,687 | 1,046,255 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 668,776 | 6,838,397 | 707,224 |
| Chevron Corp | 407,774 | 5,421,432 | 633,751 |
| Shell Plc | 288,358 | 3,139,835 | 213,165 |
| Totalenergies Se | 191,686 | 17,683,279 | 1,450,271 |
| Conocophillips | 158,548 | 6,843,333 | 1,166,061 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,570,777 | 5,463,743 | 528,488 |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 22.58 % |
| Sharkninja Inc | North America 66.47 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 50.83 % |
| Granite Ridge Resources Inc | Permian 97.40 % |
| Gran Tierra Energy Inc | Colombia 61.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 111 companies in Reserve Petroleum Co's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Reserve Petroleum Co ranks #99 of 111 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 852, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 294,099 | 20.29 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 210,996 | 14.56 % |
| 3 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 105,894 | 7.31 % |
| 4 | Eni Spa | 86,343 | 5.96 % |
| 5 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 99 | Reserve Petroleum Co | 34 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Reserve Petroleum Co's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Abundia Global Impact Group Inc | 37 | -82.49 % |
| 95 | Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited | 35 | -9.26 % |
| 96 | Spindletop Oil and Gas Co | 35 | - |
| 97 | Battalion Oil Corp | 34 | -32.07 % |
| 98 | Ckx Lands Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 99 | Reserve Petroleum Co | 34 | - |
| 100 | Klx Energy Services Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 101 | Mexco Energy Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 102 | Norris Industries Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 103 | Barnwell Industries inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 104 | Camber Energy Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Reserve Petroleum Co's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-09. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (246 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 26.14 % (avg) | -26.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 13.68 % | industry median | +2.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 32.90 % | 18.57 % (avg) | +14.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 45.42 % | 27.52 % (avg) | +17.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (246 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 4.6x | 16.1x | -11.5x |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.5x | 9.1x | -5.6x |
| P/B | 1.0x | 1.9x | -1.0x |
| Return on Equity | 24.17 % | industry aggregate | 12.10 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.96 % | 0.95 % (avg) | 4.01 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 28.24 % | -20.40 % | -38.41 % | 123.33 % | 77.38 % | -17.28 % | 19.58 % | 9.04 % |
| Operating Margin | 23.50 % | -15.17 % | -77.31 % | 7.03 % | 39.76 % | -9.51 % | 15.12 % | 14.10 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.82 % | -1.45 % | -5.04 % | 1.03 % | 9.46 % | -1.82 % | 3.55 % | 3.42 % |
| P/E | 13.3x | - | - | 23.8x | 9.0x | - | 12.8x | 4.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Strategic Group Map
Reserve Petroleum Co is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Reserve Petroleum Co's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 70.9% and operating margin of 13.7% compares with an average of 64.6% growth and 21.5% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Reserve Petroleum Co sits above that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Reserve Petroleum Co's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Reserve Petroleum Co falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -2.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 852 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 45.42 % vs industry average 27.52 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Reserve Petroleum Co's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Reserve Petroleum Co falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Reserve Petroleum Co's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 12.1 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+68.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (4.6x vs 16.1x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | 2.07 | 6.87 | 0.03 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.12 | 1.13 | 0.16 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.21 | 0.20 |
| Shell Plc | 0.37 | 1.30 | 0.05 |
| Totalenergies Se | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.02 |
| Conocophillips | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.54 |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | Q2 2026 | +226.4 % | -3.2 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | +32.7 % | +98.4 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q3 2026 | +36.3 % | +174.7 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | -6.1 % | +9.7 % |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | -7.1 % | -16.7 % |
| Conocophillips | Q3 2026 | +29.3 % | +131.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +3.9 % | +40.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | Q2 2026 | - | -11.1 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | -17.7 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q3 2026 | +33.3 % | -9.7 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Conocophillips | Q3 2026 | +26.7 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
Reserve Petroleum Co's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | 19.94% | 20.89% | 24.17% |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 8.87% | 9.71% | 15.39% |
| Chevron Corp | 8.28% | 8.44% | 14.04% |
| Shell Plc | 4.89% | 4.22% | 10.33% |
| Totalenergies Se | 4.59% | 11.37% | 11.37% |
| Conocophillips | 9.33% | 10.36% | 17.73% |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Reserve Petroleum Co's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve Petroleum Co | 4.65 | 1.24 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.67 | 1.69 |
| Chevron Corp | 15.13 | 1.75 |
| Shell Plc | 16.17 | 1.08 |
| Totalenergies Se | 16.97 | 1.18 |
| Conocophillips | 13.96 | 2.34 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 14.85 | 1.44 |
Sign in to see all peers for Reserve Petroleum Co.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.