Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rhino Resource Partners Lp (RNO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Rhino Resource Partners Lp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 160M vs 45,709M combined for tracked competitors (0.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+37.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-42.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Rhino Resource Partners Lp generated 6.3% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2018, vs 6.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -5.2% net margin compares with 23.6% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Rhino Resource Partners Lp accounted for 0.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.8% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RNO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2018
Rhino Resource Partners Lp reported revenue growth of 6.32 % year on year in Q1 2018, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.64 %.
With a net margin of -5.15 %, Rhino Resource Partners Lp reported lower profitability than its competitors (23.61 %).
Rhino Resource Partners Lp generated 0.83 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.83 % a year earlier.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp vs. its Competitors, Q1 2018
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Rhino Resource Partners Lp and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Rhino Resource Partners Lp's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Coal Mining industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 6.3% for Rhino Resource Partners Lp. Rhino Resource Partners Lp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.85% to 0.78%, a loss of 0.08 percentage points.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (15) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RNO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RNO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warrior Met Coal Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Natural Resource Partners Lp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Peabody Energy Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rhino Resource Partners Lp's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Rhino Resource Partners Lp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | - | 159.80 |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | 33,366.91 | 10,137.40 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 6,406.62 | 19,195.00 |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | 4,880.57 | 2,599.46 |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 4,850.91 | 1,680.86 |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 3,194.60 | 2,174.46 |
| SUBTOTAL | 63,025.49 | 45,868.56 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Sources: Rhino Resource Partners Lp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Rhino Resource Partners Lp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Wec Energy Group Inc | Wisconsin 78.63 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Steelmaking 97.51 % |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | Shale 59.86 % |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Mining Segment 97.79 % |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | Illinois Basin Segment 61.81 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | - | - | - |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | 33,367 | 1,417,620 | 236,904 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 6,407 | 767,800 | -33,520 |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | 4,881 | 6,665,287 | 2,435,308 |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 4,851 | 1,131,889 | 147,697 |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 3,195 | 608,240 | 76,352 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 63,025 | 849,858 | 44,083 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Arch Resources Inc | Foreign Countries 59.18 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Coal Mining industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (14 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.00 % | 33.67 % (avg) | +66.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | -26.31 % | industry median | -27.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -16.65 % | 5.41 % (avg) | -22.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 8.60 % | 4.81 % (avg) | +3.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -13.97 % | -13.52 % | 12.96 % | -26.72 % |
| Operating Margin | -26.83 % | -24.83 % | -3.08 % | -21.97 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -5.36 % | -5.19 % | -1.46 % | -10.87 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Rhino Resource Partners Lp's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Rhino Resource Partners Lp is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 8.60 % vs industry average 4.81 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Rhino Resource Partners Lp's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Rhino Resource Partners Lp's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+37.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 27.6 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 140.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (30.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-42.7% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.49 |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | 0.01 | 0.57 | 107.40 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 0.02 | 1.97 | 1.29 |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | 0.01 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 1.24 | 3.65 | 0.07 |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 0.30 | 1.78 | 0.27 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | Q1 2018 | -36.2 % | - |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +2.6 % | +23.9 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.9 % | - |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | -35.7 % | -53.0 % |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Q2 2026 | +71.3 % | +1,459.6 % |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | Q2 2026 | +0.7 % | +33.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.0 % | +59.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | Q1 2018 | - | -18.9 % |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.6 % | +52.2 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.0 % | +40.2 % |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | +25.0 % |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | Q2 2026 | +47.9 % | -69.3 % |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | Q2 2026 | - | -25.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | - | - | - |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | 3.29% | 5.16% | 847.58% |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | - | - |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | 10.48% | 11.69% | 21.20% |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 7.84% | 8.22% | 10.02% |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 9.45% | 5.99% | 15.04% |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Rhino Resource Partners Lp's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Rhino Resource Partners Lp | - | - |
| Wec Energy Group Inc | 19.62 | 3.29 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | 0.33 |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | 5.33 | 1.88 |
| Warrior Met Coal Inc | 22.06 | 2.89 |
| Alliance Resource Partners Lp | 12.10 | 1.47 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 27.78 | 1.37 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rhino Resource Partners Lp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.