Quantasing Group Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Quantasing Group Limited (QSG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Quantasing Group Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 85M vs 27,626M combined for its competitors (0.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2,347.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-27.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Quantasing Group Limited generated 22.9% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs 9.5% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 10.2% net margin compares with 30.8% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Quantasing Group Limited accounted for 9.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 8.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.42M compares with $1.11M for the peer group (0.4x).
- Structure: Quantasing Group Limited operates in the following segments: Pop Toy Business.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
QSG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Quantasing Group Limited reported revenue growth of 22.90 % year on year in Q4 2024, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.47 %.
With a net margin of 10.16 %, Quantasing Group Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (30.84 %).
Quantasing Group Limited generated 9.49 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 8.54 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Quantasing Group Limited vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Quantasing Group Limited reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Quantasing Group Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Quantasing Group Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Educational Services industry grew revenue 6.4% year over year, combined, vs 22.9% for Quantasing Group Limited. Quantasing Group Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 3.43% to 3.97%, a gain of 0.53 percentage points.
Quantasing Group Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | Yes | No | No | - |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 6) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
QSG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
QSG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
QSG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackrock Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Quantasing Group Limited's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Quantasing Group Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Quantasing Group Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Quantasing Group Limited |
390.03 | 85.36 |
 Blackrock Inc |
199,813.24 | 27,626.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 200,203.27 | 27,711.36 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Quantasing Group Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Quantasing Group Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Quantasing Group Limited reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Telenav Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Quantasing Group Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Quantasing Group Limited's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | Pop Toy Business 0.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Quantasing Group Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | 390 | 422,596 | 44,976 |
| Blackrock Inc | 199,813 | 1,109,478 | 286,345 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 199,813 | 1,109,478 | 286,345 |
Quantasing Group Limited's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Blackrock Inc | Americas 63.73 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Quantasing Group Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 39 companies in Quantasing Group Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Quantasing Group Limited ranks #0 of 39 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 901, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham Holdings Co | 5,251 | 15.02 % |
| 2 | Laureate Education Inc | 4,884 | 13.97 % |
| 3 | Covista inc | 4,078 | 11.67 % |
| 4 | Stride Inc | 3,610 | 10.33 % |
| 5 | Grand Canyon Education inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Youdao Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Tal Education Group | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Perdoceo Education Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | 17 Education and Technology Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Universal Technical Institute Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Quantasing Group Limited | 1,022 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Quantasing Group Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-11-10.
Quantasing Group Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Educational Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (69 companies). See the full Educational Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 34.67 % (avg) | -34.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | -49.33 % | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | -46.54 % | -0.78 % (avg) | -45.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 5.12 % | 4.02 % (avg) | +1.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Quantasing Group Limited's Strategic Group Map
Quantasing Group Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Quantasing Group Limited's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -77.6% and operating margin of -49.3% compares with an average of -42.9% growth and -35.9% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Quantasing Group Limited sits below that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Quantasing Group Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 901 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 5.12 % vs industry average 4.02 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Quantasing Group Limited's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Quantasing Group Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Quantasing Group Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Quantasing Group Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2,347.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-27.9% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Quantasing Group Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | 2.84 | 6.01 | - |
| Blackrock Inc | 7.72 | 7.87 | 0.23 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Quantasing Group Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | Q2 2024 | -77.6 % | -81.9 % |
| Blackrock Inc | Q2 2026 | +27.2 % | +22.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +20.5 % | +19.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Quantasing Group Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | Q2 2024 | -18.7 % | +48,419.9 % |
| Blackrock Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +22.5 % |
Quantasing Group Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | 5.43% | 6.27% | 9.82% |
| Blackrock Inc | 4.20% | 4.33% | 12.59% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Quantasing Group Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Quantasing Group Limited | 295.92 | 4.57 |
| Blackrock Inc | 28.87 | 7.23 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 28.04 | 7.22 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.