Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Neogames S A's Competitiveness

Name: Neogames S A Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Neogames S A (NGMS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2021

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

Share of combined sales, Q4 2021

Revenue Growth Y/Y

Q4 2021

Net Margin

24.66 %

Q4 2021

Key Findings: Neogames S A vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 192M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+5.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Peer revenue share: Neogames S A accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

NGMS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021

Neogames S A generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NGMS/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NGMS/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NGMS/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

Neogames S A's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Neogames S a	-	-	-	-
High-Confidence Competitors (1)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

NGMS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

NGMS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Neogames S A's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.

High-Confidence
(0 of 1)

Entity	TTM Share Price Return (group: median)	vs U.S.A. 500
Neogames S a	-	-
Competitors combined (0)	40.4%	63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0)	40.4%	63.2%

Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Neogames S A's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

NGMS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

NGMS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

Neogames S A's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company maintains a portfolio of over 350 proprietary iLottery games and operates a dedicated iLottery-focused game studio. The iLottery industry is characterized by significant barriers to entry, including stringent government procurement processes, regulatory compliance requirements, and the necessity for specialized technology. Competition for new contracts is intense among existing providers. The company’s primary competitors for turnkey solutions contracts include International Game Technology PLC (IGT), Scientific Games Corp. (SGMS), now owned by Brookfield Business Partners L.P., and Intralot. For game contracts, the company competes against IGT, SGMS, and Instant Win Gaming Ltd., excluding Intralot. While other companies may secure some market share in content, they generally rely on hosting their games on platforms such as the company’s. The company asserts that expertise and experience in developing and operating iLottery technology platforms serve as barriers to new entrants.

Neogames S A's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.

Competitor	Basis	Confidence	Active	Sources
Instant Win Gaming Ltd.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Scientific Games Corp.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
International Game Technology PLC	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Brookfield Business Partners L.P.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Intralot	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3

Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Neogames S A's named competitors require a Commercial License.