Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Mts Systems's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mts Systems (MTSC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2020
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-3.42 %
Q1 2020
Net Margin
0.86 %
Q1 2020

Key Findings: Mts Systems vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 822M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Mts Systems accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

MTSC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2020

Mts Systems generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MTSC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MTSC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MTSC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Scientific & Technical Instruments industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs -3.4% for Mts Systems. Mts Systems's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.94% to 0.80%, a loss of 0.13 percentage points.

Mts Systems's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Mts Systems Corporation No No No Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2020

100%market share
  • Mts Systems100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Mts Systems and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Mts Systems's full market share breakdown »

MTSC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MTSC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Mts Systems's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
66.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Mts Systems Corporation - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mts Systems's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MTSC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MTSC High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

MTSC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

MTSC Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Mts Systems's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Test Segment
For relatively simple and inexpensive mechanical testing applications, customers may satisfy their needs internally by building their own test systems or using competitors who compete on price, performance, quality and service. For larger and more complex mechanical test systems, we compete directly with several companies throughout the world based upon customer value including application knowledge, engineering capabilities, technical features, price, quality and service.

Sensors Segment
We primarily compete on factors that include technical performance, price and service in new applications or in situations in which other position sensing technologies have been used. Sensors’ competitors are typically either larger companies that carry multiple sensor product lines or smaller, privately held companies throughout the world.

Mts Systems's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Tradeweb Markets Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mts Systems's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Mts Systems's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Mts Systems Corporation Test & Simulation 56.95 % Sensors 43.16 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License