Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Mag Silver's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mag Silver (MAG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2023
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2023
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2023
Net Margin
74.75 %
Q4 2023

Key Findings: Mag Silver vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 65M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Mag Silver accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

MAG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023

Mag Silver generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MAG/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MAG/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MAG/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Mag Silver's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Mag Silver Corp - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 0% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2023

100%market share
  • Mag Silver100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Mag Silver and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Mag Silver's full market share breakdown »

MAG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MAG Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Mag Silver's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Mag Silver Corp 81.80 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mag Silver's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MAG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MAG High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

Mag Silver's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Brainsway Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mag Silver's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.