Lexmark International Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lexmark International Inc (LXK) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lexmark International Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,482M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+11.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Lexmark International Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LXK Sales vs. its Competitors, 2015
Lexmark International Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Computer Hardware industry grew revenue 29.2% year over year, combined, vs -5.3% for Lexmark International Inc. Lexmark International Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.57% to 0.42%, a loss of 0.15 percentage points.
LXK Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LXK Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Lexmark International Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lexmark International Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
