Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc (HII) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 13,185M vs 140,135M combined for tracked competitors (8.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc generated 10.9% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 7.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.1% net margin compares with 8.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc ranks #2 of 6 companies by market capitalization in the Ship & Boat Building industry, holding 10.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc accounted for 8.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 8.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.30M compares with $0.63M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
HII Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc reported revenue growth of 10.90 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.48 %.
With a net margin of 6.09 %, Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.62 %).
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc generated 8.69 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 8.44 % a year earlier.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Ship & Boat Building industry grew revenue 11.5% year over year, combined, vs 10.9% for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 19.68% to 19.57%, a loss of 0.11 percentage points.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (8) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
HII Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
HII Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
HII Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
HII Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Manitowoc Company Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Gulf Island Fabrication Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | General Dynamics Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Northrop Grumman Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We believe we are well-positioned in the market. Because we are the only company currently capable of building, refueling and defueling the U.S. Navys nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, we believe we are in a strong competitive position to be awarded each contract to perform such activities. Even so, the government periodically revisits whether refueling of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers should be performed in private or public facilities. In this regard, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ("2012 Act") required DoD to develop a core depot level maintenance capability to refuel nuclear aircraft carriers. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ("2013 Act") modified the 2012 Act by restoring an exception for the nuclear refueling of an aircraft level maintenance. The 2013 Act also amended and clarified the exception to cover the concurrent refueling and overhaul of an aircraft carrier, as well as the defueling of an aircraft carrier. Similarly, the 2013 Act restored an exclusion for nuclear aircraft carrier programs from the definition of core logistics capabilities that was found in previous law.
We are currently the only builder of large deck amphibious assault and expeditionary warfare ships for the U.S. Navy, including LHAs and LPDs, and are positioned to be awarded future contracts for these types of vessels. We are also the sole supplier of NSCs for the U.S. Coast Guard, and are positioned to be awarded future contracts for these types of vessels. We are one of only two companies currently designing and building nuclear-powered submarines for the U.S. Navy, and we are party to a long-term teaming agreement with the other company for the production of such vessels. We are one of only two companies that builds the U.S. Navys current fleet of DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and are positioned to be awarded future contracts for these types of ships as well.
Our success in the shipbuilding defense industry depends upon our ability to develop, market and produce our products and services at a cost consistent with the U.S. Navys budget, as well as our ability to provide the workforce, technologies, facilities, equipment and financial capacity needed to deliver those products and services with maximum efficiency.
We compete with a variety of companies in the provision of engineering services in the energy and oil and gas markets.
Publicly Traded Peers of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 10,153.48 | 13,185.00 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,732.91 | 77,014.00 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,602.95 | 53,808.00 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,025.92 | 42,892.00 |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | 9,860.56 | 3,779.00 |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | 4,530.05 | 14,130.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 308,909.50 | 207,296.73 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Sources: Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bwx Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mission Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Our Mission Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Raytheon Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | Newport News Shipbuilding 53.73 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Aeronautics 40.43 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Marine Systems 32.36 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Aeronautics Systems 32.36 % |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | Advanced Sensing and Computing 66.08 % |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Global Engineering Solutions 57.79 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 10,153 | 299,659 | 15,023 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,733 | 626,130 | 51,114 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,603 | 459,897 | 37,103 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,026 | 5,718,933 | 599,467 |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | 9,861 | 517,671 | 44,110 |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | 4,530 | 282,600 | 4,020 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 298,756 | 625,481 | 50,513 |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | United States 70.72 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | United States 85.81 % |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | United States 77.86 % |
| The Manitowoc Company Inc | Americas Segment 50.75 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 6 companies in Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc ranks #2 of 6 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 9.99 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 8,061, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Dynamics Corporation | 91,984 | 89.23 % |
| 2 | Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 10,298 | 9.99 % |
| 3 | Malibu Boats Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 4 | Mastercraft Boat Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 5 | Twin Vee Powercats Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Vision Marine Technologies inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Dynamics Corporation | 91,984 | 3.43 % |
| 2 | Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 10,298 | -3.89 % |
| 3 | Malibu Boats Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 4 | Mastercraft Boat Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Twin Vee Powercats Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Vision Marine Technologies inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Ship & Boat Building industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (7 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 14.03 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | 5.29 % | industry median | +5.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.50 % | -2.55 % (avg) | +12.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.28 % | 2.69 % (avg) | +0.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Ship & Boat Building industry average (7 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.9x | 30.7x | -12.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.6x | 15.0x | -3.4x |
| P/B | 2.3x | 2.3x | 0.0x |
| Return on Equity | 12.89 % | industry aggregate | 1.86 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.61 % | -8.03 % (avg) | 12.64 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 9.88 % | 8.84 % | 5.19 % | 1.74 % | 12.10 % | 7.29 % | 0.71 % | 8.23 % |
| Operating Margin | 11.63 % | 8.27 % | 8.54 % | 5.39 % | 5.29 % | 6.82 % | 4.79 % | 5.26 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 14.83 % | 10.81 % | 10.34 % | 5.50 % | 5.05 % | 6.53 % | 4.46 % | 4.49 % |
| P/E | 10.6x | 19.4x | 9.7x | 14.0x | 15.9x | 14.5x | 14.0x | 22.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.11x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 13.5% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: General Dynamics Corporation alone holds 89% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 8,061 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.28 % vs industry average 2.69 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 5.6 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.11x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 13.5% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (17.9x vs 30.7x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by General Dynamics Corporation, holding 89.23 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 0.00 | 1.17 | 0.53 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0.14 | 1.14 | 2.92 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 0.14 | 1.40 | 0.33 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.20 | 1.13 | 0.89 |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | 0.35 | 1.92 | 0.10 |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | 0.20 | 1.41 | 0.84 |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.9 % | +36.8 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +436.8 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +10.3 % | +13.2 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | -6.8 % |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.1 % | +59.3 % |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.0 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +8.4 % | +63.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +24.0 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -9.4 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +13.1 % | +43.0 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +34.2 % | +30.7 % |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.0 % | +3.6 % |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.0 % | +83.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 5.26% | 6.56% | 12.89% |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 10.40% | 14.74% | 86.24% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 7.52% | 13.52% | 17.41% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 8.93% | 11.14% | 26.58% |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | 7.52% | 10.50% | 11.76% |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | 1.78% | 2.09% | 4.29% |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 15.31 | 0.77 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 19.13 | 1.55 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 20.99 | 1.70 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 16.10 | 1.68 |
| Leonardo Drs Inc | 30.82 | 2.61 |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | 22.28 | 0.32 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.91 | 1.49 |
Sign in to see all peers for Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.