Cu Bancorp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cu Bancorp (CUNB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cu Bancorp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 115M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+8.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Cu Bancorp accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.44M compares with $0.48M for the peer group (0.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CUNB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2017
Cu Bancorp generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Regional Banks industry grew revenue -15.0% year over year, combined, vs 19.9% for Cu Bancorp. Cu Bancorp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Cu Bancorp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CUNB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CUNB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meridianlink inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cu Bancorp's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Cu Bancorp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | 666.42 | 115.41 |
| Meridianlink inc | 1,530.35 | 324.36 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,196.77 | 439.77 |
Sources: Cu Bancorp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cu Bancorp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cu Bancorp's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Meridianlink inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cu Bancorp's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cu Bancorp's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | 666 | 435,506 | 119,309 |
| Meridianlink inc | 1,530 | 475,607 | -32,982 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,530 | 475,607 | -32,982 |
Cu Bancorp's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Regional Banks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (130 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.13 % | 64.14 % (avg) | +10.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 51.05 % | industry median | +12.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 50.19 % | 49.90 % (avg) | +0.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.48 % | 3.18 % (avg) | -2.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Cu Bancorp's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Regional Banks industry average (130 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 21.8x | 15.6x | +6.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.2x | 6.2x | +1.0x |
| P/B | 1.9x | 1.3x | +0.6x |
| Return on Equity | 9.20 % | industry aggregate | 0.41 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.32 % | 3.20 % (avg) | 5.12 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Cu Bancorp's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -26.49 % | 60.19 % | 13.59 % |
| Operating Margin | - | 36.25 % | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 5.39 % | - |
| P/E | - | 21.3x | 20.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Cu Bancorp's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Cu Bancorp's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Cu Bancorp is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Cu Bancorp's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.48 % vs industry average 3.18 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cu Bancorp's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cu Bancorp's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cu Bancorp's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Cu Bancorp falls in the High attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Cu Bancorp's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 12.3 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+8.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 12.3% median pace.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cu Bancorp's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | 0.10 | 1.06 | 0.08 |
| Meridianlink inc | 1.43 | 2.12 | 1.12 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cu Bancorp's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | Q2 2017 | +19.9 % | +40.1 % |
| Meridianlink inc | Q2 2025 | +7.1 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.3 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cu Bancorp's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | Q2 2017 | -72.0 % | +18.0 % |
| Meridianlink inc | Q2 2025 | -3.6 % | +10.2 % |
Cu Bancorp's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | 1.05% | 8.69% | 9.20% |
| Meridianlink inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cu Bancorp's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cu Bancorp | 22.32 | 5.77 |
| Meridianlink inc | - | 4.72 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 240.79 | 5.00 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.