T1 Energy Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of T1 Energy Inc (TE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: T1 Energy Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 986M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: T1 Energy Inc ranks #73 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: T1 Energy Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
T1 Energy Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs 89.0% for T1 Energy Inc. T1 Energy Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.04%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
T1 Energy Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | No | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | - | - | - | |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TE Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TE Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TE Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lithium Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for T1 Energy Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
T1 Energy Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Tampa Electric’s retail electric business is substantially free from direct competition with other electric utilities, municipalities and public agencies. At the present time, the principal form of competition at the retail level consists of self-generation available to larger users of electric energy. Such users may seek to expand their alternatives through various initiatives, including legislative and/or regulatory changes that would permit competition at the retail level. Distributed generation could also be a source of competition in the future, but has not been a significant factor to date. Tampa Electric intends to retain and expand its retail business by managing costs and providing quality service to retail customers.
Unlike the retail electric business, Tampa Electric competes in the wholesale power market with other energy providers in Florida, including approximately 30 other investor-owned, municipal and other utilities, as well as co-generators and other unregulated power generators with uncontracted excess capacity. Entities compete to provide energy on a short-term basis (i.e., hourly or daily) and on a long-term basis. Competition in these markets is primarily based on having available energy to sell to the wholesale market and the price. In Florida, available energy for the wholesale markets is affected by the state’s PPSA, which sets the state’s electric energy and environmental policy, and governs the building of new generation involving steam capacity of 75 MW or more. The PPSA requires that applicants demonstrate that a plant is needed prior to receiving construction and operating permits. The effect of the PPSA has been to limit the number of unregulated generating units with excess capacity for sale in the wholesale power markets in Florida.
Tampa Electric is not a major participant in the wholesale market because it uses its lower cost generation to serve its retail customers rather than the wholesale market. Over the past three years, gross revenues from wholesale sales, which include fuel that is a pass-through cost, have averaged less than 1% of Tampa Electric’s total revenue.
FPSC rules promote cost-competitiveness in the building of new steam generating capacity by requiring IOUs, such as Tampa Electric, to issue RFPs prior to filing a petition for Determination of Need for construction of a power plant with a steam cycle greater than 75 MW. These rules, which allow independent power producers and others to bid to supply the new generating capacity, provide a mechanism for expedited dispute resolution, allow bidders to submit new bids whenever the IOU revises its cost estimates for its self-build option, require IOUs to disclose the methodology and criteria to be used to evaluate the bids and provide more stringent standards for the IOUs to recover cost overruns in the event that the self-build option is deemed the most cost-effective.
Although PGS is not in direct competition with any other regulated distributors
of natural gas for customers within its service areas, there are other forms
of competition. At the present time, the principal form of competition for residential
and small commercial customers is from companies providing other sources of
energy, including electricity, propane and fuel oil. PGS has taken actions to
retain and expand its commodity and transportation business, including managing
costs and providing high quality service to customers.
In Florida, gas service is unbundled for all non-residential customers. PGS
has a “NaturalChoice” program, offering unbundled transportation
service to all non-residential customers, as well as residential customers consuming
in excess of 1,999 therms annually, allowing these customers to purchase commodity
gas from a third party but continue to pay PGS for the transportation. As a
result, PGS receives its base rate for distribution regardless of whether a
customer decides to opt for transportation-only service or continue bundled
service.
Publicly Traded Peers of T1 Energy Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | 1,000.06 | 985.86 |
| Lithium Corporation | 5.89 | - |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,005.96 | 985.86 |
Sources: T1 Energy Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on T1 Energy Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
T1 Energy Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Solar | Named by the company | 85% |
| Northvolt | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hanwha Qcells | Named by the company | 85% |
| JinkoSolar | Named by the company | 85% |
| SK Innovation | Named by the company | 85% |
| CATL | Named by the company | 85% |
| Panasonic | Named by the company | 85% |
| Trina Solar | Named by the company | 85% |
| BYD | Named by the company | 85% |
| LG Chem | Named by the company | 85% |
| First Solar | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung SDI | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lithium Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for T1 Energy Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
T1 Energy Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | 1,000 | 1,754,192 | -682,635 |
| Lithium Corporation | 6 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 6 | - | - |
T1 Energy Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 109 companies in T1 Energy Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.T1 Energy Inc ranks #73 of 109 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.01 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,389, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,648,317 | 44.54 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 14.07 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,220,833 | 9.63 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,024,665 | 8.08 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 73 | T1 Energy Inc | 1,035 | 0.01 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of T1 Energy Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
T1 Energy Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | Cts Corporation | 1,725 | 49.89 % |
| 69 | Ambiq Micro Inc | 1,520 | 130.15 % |
| 70 | Shoals Technologies Group Inc | 1,245 | -3.36 % |
| 71 | Arteris Inc | 1,102 | 136.89 % |
| 72 | Wolfspeed Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 73 | T1 Energy Inc | 1,035 | 62.78 % |
| 74 | Kopin Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 75 | Alpha And Omega Semiconductor Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 76 | Canadian Solar inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 77 | Kimball Electronics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 78 | Indie Semiconductor Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of T1 Energy Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
T1 Energy Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 7.39 % | 34.40 % (avg) | -27.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | -23.03 % | industry median | -25.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -23.89 % | 7.07 % (avg) | -31.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 19.14 % | 9.39 % (avg) | +9.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
T1 Energy Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 22.7x | - |
| P/B | 10.8x | 6.6x | +4.2x |
| Return on Equity | -195.30 % | industry aggregate | -242.13 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -18.50 % | -0.16 % (avg) | -18.34 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
T1 Energy Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs T1 Energy Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
T1 Energy Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 45% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
T1 Energy Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,389 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 19.14 % vs industry average 9.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See T1 Energy Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See T1 Energy Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
T1 Energy Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
T1 Energy Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
T1 Energy Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 25.9 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 242.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 44.54 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
T1 Energy Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | 0.16 | 1.27 | 3.27 |
| Lithium Corporation | - | 1.09 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
T1 Energy Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +89.0 % | - |
| Lithium Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +89.0 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
T1 Energy Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +101.0 % | +343.4 % |
| Lithium Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
T1 Energy Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | - | - | - |
| Lithium Corporation | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
T1 Energy Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc | - | 1.01 |
| Lithium Corporation | - | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 1.02 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
