Prudential Financial Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Prudential Financial Inc (PRU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Prudential Financial Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 64,765M vs 1,993,019M combined for tracked competitors (3.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Prudential Financial Inc generated 14.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 10.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.6% net margin compares with 21.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Prudential Financial Inc ranks #4 of 19 companies by market capitalization in the Life Insurance industry, holding 11.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Prudential Financial Inc accounted for 3.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 2.9% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.76M compares with $0.89M for the peer group (2.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PRU Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Prudential Financial Inc reported revenue growth of 14.10 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.99 %.
With a net margin of 6.62 %, Prudential Financial Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (21.94 %).
Prudential Financial Inc generated 2.97 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 2.87 % a year earlier.
Prudential Financial Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Prudential Financial Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Prudential Financial Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Life Insurance industry grew revenue 5.1% year over year, combined, vs 14.1% for Prudential Financial Inc. Prudential Financial Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 6.57% to 7.13%, a gain of 0.57 percentage points.
Prudential Financial Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (110) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PRU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PRU Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
PRU Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Fire Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Wisdomtree Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Principal Financial Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Franklin Resources Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Prudential Financial Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Prudential Financial Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The Retirement segment competes with other large, well-established insurance
companies, asset managers, recordkeepers and diversified financial institutions.
In our full service business, we compete primarily based on pricing, the breadth
of our service and investment offerings, investment performance, and our ability
to offer product features to meet the retirement income needs of our clients.
In recent years, we have seen a trend towards unbundling of the purchase decision
related to the recordkeeping and investment offerings, where the variety and
flexibility of available funds and their performance are key selection criteria
to plan sponsors and intermediaries. Additionally, regulations requiring more
standard and consistent fee disclosures across industry providers have heightened
pricing pressures. We have also seen slow case turnover in our mid to large
case target markets.
In our institutional investment products business, we compete primarily based
on our pricing and structuring capabilities, as well as our ability to offer
innovative product solutions. Sales of institutional investment products are
affected by competitive factors such as investment performance, company credit
and financial strength ratings, product design, marketplace visibility, distribution
capabilities, fees, crediting rates, and customer service. In recent years,
we have established ourselves as a leader in the stable value wrap market and
as an innovator in providing pension risk management solutions to plan sponsors.
We believe the pension risk transfer market continues to offer attractive opportunities
that are aligned with our expertise. However, increased competition and existing
intermediary relationships reaching saturation levels may impact our momentum
in the stable value wrap market. For certain of our traditional institutional
investment products, economic conditions and other competitive factors have
resulted in maturing contracts outpacing new issuances.
The Asset Management segment competes with numerous asset managers and other financial institutions. For our asset management products, we compete based on a number of factors, including investment performance, strategy and process, talent, organizational stability and client relationships. We offer products across multiple asset classes, with specialized investment teams that employ approaches designed to add value in each product area or asset class. Our organizational stability and robust institutional and retail businesses have helped attract and retain talent critical to delivering investment results for clients. Our private placement and commercial mortgage businesses compete based on price, terms, execution and the strength of our relationship with the borrower. Competition will vary depending on the product or service being offered.
The Individual Life segment competes with large, well-established life insurance
companies in a mature market. We compete primarily based on price, service,
distribution channel relationships, brand recognition and financial strength.
Due to the large number of competitors, pricing is competitive. Factors that
could influence our ability to competitively price products while achieving
targeted returns include: the cost and availability of financing for statutory
reserves required for certain term and universal life insurance policies; the
availability, utilization and timing of tax deductions associated with statutory
reserves; product designs that impact the amount of statutory reserves and the
associated tax deductions; and the level and volatility of interest rates.
We compete with other large, well-established life and health insurance providers
in mature U.S. markets, and are a top provider of both group life and disability
insurance. We compete primarily based on price, strong brand recognition, service
capabilities, customer relationships, financial stability and range of product
offerings. Pricing of group insurance products reflects the large number of
competitors in the marketplace. The majority of our premiums are derived from
large corporations, affinity groups or other organizations having over 10,000
insured individuals. We have a strong portfolio of products and the capability
to offer customized benefit solutions, providing opportunities for continuing
stabilized premiums. Employee-paid (voluntary) coverage has become increasingly
important as employers attempt to control costs and shift benefit decisions/funding
to employees who continue to value benefits offered at the workplace. Our profitability
is dependent, in part, on penetration in the voluntary coverage marketplace,
which will be affected by future employment and compensation rates.
The life insurance markets in Japan and Korea are mature and pricing is competitive. Rather than competing based on price, we generally compete on the basis of customer service, including our needs-based approach to selling, the quality and diversity of our distribution capabilities, and our financial strength. The aging population throughout Asia creates an increasing need for product innovation, introducing insurance products which allow for savings and income as the population transitions to retirement. The ability to sell through multiple and complementary distribution channels is a competitive advantage. However, competition for sales personnel, as well as access to third party distribution channels, is intense.
Publicly Traded Peers of Prudential Financial Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | 41,246.37 | 64,765.00 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,840.78 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609.27 | 121,098.00 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,821.16 | 68,350.00 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 279,373.77 | 52,259.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,473.80 | 83,940.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 4,185,007.45 | 2,304,030.32 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Prudential Financial Inc .
Sources: Prudential Financial Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Prudential Financial Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Prudential Financial Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Aegon Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bank Bradesco | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Prudential Financial Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Prudential Financial Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | 41,246 | 1,758,771 | 110,417 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,841 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,821 | 823,494 | 245,422 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 279,374 | 1,102,511 | 442,468 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,474 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 4,143,761 | 891,465 | 167,487 |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Prudential Financial Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Blackrock Inc | Americas 64.41 % |
| Aon Plc | Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Other Than United Kingdom and Ireland 16.91 % |
| Franklin Resources Inc | United States 72.53 % |
| Invesco Ltd | Americas 75.98 % |
| Stifel Financial Corp | Americas 55.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Prudential Financial Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | Total Reconciling Items 1.88 % |
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| Apollo Global Management Inc | Retirement Services 36.50 % |
| The Cigna Group | Evernorth 85.32 % |
| Energy Transfer Lp | Crude oil transportation and services 27.94 % |
| Metlife Inc | Group Benefits 36.13 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Prudential Financial Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 18 companies in Prudential Financial Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Prudential Financial Inc ranks #4 of 18 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 11.34 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,325, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manulife Financial Corporation | 85,568 | 23.53 % |
| 2 | Metlife Inc | 62,781 | 17.26 % |
| 3 | Sun Life Financial Inc | 48,173 | 13.25 % |
| 4 | Prudential Financial Inc | 41,246 | 11.34 % |
| 5 | Prudential Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Reinsurance Group Of America Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Corebridge Financial Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Globe Life Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Jackson Financial Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Voya Financial Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Prudential Financial Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Prudential Financial Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manulife Financial Corporation | 85,568 | 42.70 % |
| 2 | Metlife Inc | 62,781 | 20.89 % |
| 3 | Sun Life Financial Inc | 48,173 | 35.67 % |
| 4 | Prudential Financial Inc | 41,246 | 15.46 % |
| 5 | Prudential Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Reinsurance Group Of America Incorporated | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Corebridge Financial Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Globe Life Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Jackson Financial Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Prudential Financial Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Prudential Financial Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Life Insurance industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (28 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.74 % | 44.67 % (avg) | -0.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.39 % | 20.82 % (avg) | -11.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 0.70 % (avg) | -0.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Prudential Financial Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Life Insurance industry average (28 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.9x | 17.6x | -7.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | -33.8x | 13.8x | -47.6x |
| P/B | 1.2x | 1.2x | +0.0x |
| Return on Equity | 12.56 % | industry aggregate | 1.58 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 5.48 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Prudential Financial Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 5.53 % | 2.88 % | -12.00 % | 24.37 % | -15.34 % | -10.11 % | 30.43 % | -13.68 % |
| Operating Margin | 7.67 % | 7.85 % | -0.57 % | 13.22 % | -0.81 % | 8.59 % | 6.64 % | 10.40 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.82 % | 0.80 % | -0.05 % | 1.39 % | -0.08 % | 0.63 % | 0.61 % | 1.24 % |
| P/E | 9.4x | 9.2x | - | 5.6x | - | 15.1x | 16.3x | 11.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Prudential Financial Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Prudential Financial Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Prudential Financial Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.48x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 7.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Prudential Financial Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,325 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 0.70 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Prudential Financial Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Prudential Financial Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Prudential Financial Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Prudential Financial Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Prudential Financial Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.48x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Prudential Financial Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.83 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Morgan Stanley | 0.40 | 1.12 | 3.16 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 0.50 | 0.79 | 3.11 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Prudential Financial Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | Q2 2026 | +14.1 % | +83.0 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | -30.6 % | +58.1 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -65.3 % | +78.0 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.0 % | +45.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Prudential Financial Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | Q2 2026 | +79.4 % | - |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | - | +7.3 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -73.4 % | +5.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
Prudential Financial Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | 0.52% | 0.82% | 12.56% |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Morgan Stanley | 1.35% | 1.95% | 17.85% |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 1.07% | 1.86% | 16.95% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Prudential Financial Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Prudential Financial Inc | 10.75 | 0.64 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.17 | 4.87 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.78 | 3.34 |
| Morgan Stanley | 15.67 | 4.45 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 14.19 | 5.35 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.82 | 2.96 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 9.85 | 1.82 |
Sign in to see all peers for Prudential Financial Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
