Materion's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Materion (MTRN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Materion vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,097M vs 252,635M combined for tracked competitors (0.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+17.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+11.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Materion generated 42.2% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 12.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 17.9% net margin compares with 18.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Materion ranks #18 of 71 companies by market capitalization in the IT Infrastructure industry, holding 0.6% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Materion accounted for 0.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.7% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.73M compares with $0.51M for the peer group (1.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MTRN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Materion reported revenue growth of 42.22 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.66 %.
With a net margin of 17.91 %, Materion reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.98 %).
Materion generated 0.87 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.69 % a year earlier.
Materion vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Materion and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Materion's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the IT Infrastructure industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs 42.2% for Materion. Materion's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.79% to 0.93%, a gain of 0.14 percentage points.
Materion's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (41) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MTRN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MTRN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MTRN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MTRN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viavi Solutions Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Ati Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Preformed Line Products Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Kaiser Aluminum Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Corning Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Materion's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Materion's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Materion Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | 5,521.44 | 2,096.53 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615.00 | 16,964.00 |
| 3m Company | 88,536.35 | 25,180.00 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,080.91 | 16,995.90 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390.27 | 36,130.00 |
| Te Connectivity plc | 62,910.03 | 19,322.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 695,548.23 | 313,589.79 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Materion Corporation.
Sources: Materion Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Materion Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Materion's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Aurubis AG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. KG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Minotti Metals, SA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nippon Mining | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sci Engineered Materials inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| AMPCO Metal | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chuetsu Metal Works Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| KME AG & Co. KG | Named by the company | 85% |
| NGK Metals | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wickeder Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| American Beryllia Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aurubis Stolberg GmbH | Named by the company | 85% |
| Heraeus Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| MKM Mansfelder Kupfer und Messing GmbH | Named by the company | 85% |
| Proterial Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| ATI Specialty Metals | Named by the company | 85% |
| CoorsTek, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Le Bronze Alloys | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wieland Electric, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| AMI Doduco, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| CBL Ceramics Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| IBC Advanced Alloys Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| NGK Insulators | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ulba Metallurgical | Named by the company | 85% |
| Optex Systems Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Materion's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Materion's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | Performance Materials 28.36 % |
| Corning Inc | Optical Communications 40.55 % |
| 3m Company | Safety and Industrial 47.55 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 50.05 % |
| Te Connectivity plc | Transportation Solutions 51.05 % |
| Nucor Corporation | Steel mills 63.56 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Materion's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | 5,521 | 727,962 | 56,018 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615 | 252,440 | 30,863 |
| 3m Company | 88,536 | 416,198 | 49,785 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,081 | 354,081 | 44,450 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390 | 357,723 | 81,356 |
| Te Connectivity plc | 62,910 | 222,092 | 34,667 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 690,027 | 512,410 | 44,662 |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Materion's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| 3m Company | Americas 54.09 % |
| Te Connectivity plc | Asia Pacific 36.91 % |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | US 92.24 % |
| Ati Inc | United States 60.14 % |
| Carpenter Technology Corporation | United States 58.40 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Materion's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 66 companies in Materion's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Materion ranks #18 of 66 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.62 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,234, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amphenol Corporation | 218,184 | 24.50 % |
| 2 | Danaher Corporation | 160,859 | 18.06 % |
| 3 | Vertiv Holdings Co | 95,846 | 10.76 % |
| 4 | Teradyne Inc | 63,282 | 7.11 % |
| 5 | Keysight Technologies inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Ametek Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Roper Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Hubbell Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Veralto Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Mks Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 18 | Materion Corporation | 5,521 | 0.62 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Materion's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Materion's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Ul Solutions Inc | 13,219 | -3.85 % |
| 14 | Advanced Energy Industries inc | 11,753 | 67.88 % |
| 15 | Cognex Corp | 9,987 | 29.74 % |
| 16 | Ralliant Corporation | 7,877 | 62.24 % |
| 17 | Sensata Technologies Holding Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Materion Corporation | 5,521 | 123.28 % |
| 19 | Impinj Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Vishay Intertechnology Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 21 | Mercury Systems Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 22 | Itron Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 23 | Universal Display Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Materion's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Materion's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the IT Infrastructure industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (79 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.02 % | 39.24 % (avg) | -23.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 5.99 % | industry median | +2.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.02 % | 5.24 % (avg) | +2.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 3.72 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Materion's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the IT Infrastructure industry average (79 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 54.7x | 39.9x | +14.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.1x | 20.9x | +11.2x |
| P/B | 5.2x | 4.7x | +0.5x |
| Return on Equity | 16.85 % | industry aggregate | 3.20 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.11 % | -0.81 % (avg) | 5.92 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Materion's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 6.00 % | -1.85 % | -0.77 % | 28.43 % | 16.32 % | -5.24 % | 1.14 % | 6.04 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.09 % | 5.65 % | 0.70 % | 5.10 % | 6.82 % | 8.19 % | 2.80 % | 6.15 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.16 % | 5.14 % | 0.57 % | 4.34 % | 5.49 % | 6.06 % | 2.01 % | 4.67 % |
| P/E | 49.0x | 24.1x | 70.4x | 25.3x | 20.4x | 25.7x | 369.7x | 35.5x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Materion's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Materion's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Materion is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Materion's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Materion's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Materion falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.03x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Materion's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,234 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Materion's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Materion's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Materion's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Materion falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Materion's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+17.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.03x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Materion's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | 0.06 | 3.08 | 0.49 |
| Corning Inc | 0.25 | 1.64 | 0.68 |
| 3m Company | - | 1.57 | 3.20 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.38 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0.51 | 1.31 | 2.10 |
| Te Connectivity plc | 0.25 | 1.71 | 0.44 |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Materion's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | Q2 2026 | +42.2 % | +337.4 % |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.6 % | +21.8 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +2.5 % | +29.4 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | +1.9 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | -6.1 % | +262.4 % |
| Te Connectivity plc | Q2 2026 | +13.8 % | +17.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.0 % | +110.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Materion's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | Q2 2026 | +46.0 % | -29.2 % |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.5 % | +37.0 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +4.7 % | +7.2 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | +10.8 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +39.4 % |
| Te Connectivity plc | Q2 2026 | +13.3 % | +32.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
Materion's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | 8.79% | 10.75% | 16.85% |
| Corning Inc | 6.63% | 8.04% | 16.66% |
| 3m Company | 8.27% | 11.16% | 76.55% |
| Ecolab Inc | 8.24% | 9.11% | 21.51% |
| Honeywell International Inc | 10.74% | 17.01% | 49.57% |
| Te Connectivity plc | 11.84% | 14.32% | 23.36% |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Materion's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation | 61.02 | 2.63 |
| Corning Inc | 69.21 | 7.82 |
| 3m Company | 30.10 | 3.52 |
| Ecolab Inc | 37.59 | 4.65 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 8.31 | 1.87 |
| Te Connectivity plc | 21.05 | 3.26 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 25.47 | 2.22 |
Sign in to see all peers for Materion Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.