Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Loop Media Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Loop Media Inc (LPTV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-67.49 %
Q3 2025
Net Margin
-267.84 %
Q3 2025

Key Findings: Loop Media Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 10M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-47.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Loop Media Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

LPTV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2025

Loop Media Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPTV/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPTV/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPTV/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs -67.5% for Loop Media Inc. Loop Media Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Loop Media Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Loop Media Inc No No No Yes
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2025

100%market share
  • Loop Media Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Loop Media Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Loop Media Inc's full market share breakdown »

LPTV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

LPTV Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

LPTV Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

LPTV Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Loop Media Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive and fragmented out-of-home (OOH) market. Its direct competitors in this sector include Atmosphere, UPshow, and Rockbot. Key competitive factors in the market are price, technology, and the quality of music video and other entertainment content.

Loop Media Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
UPshow Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Rockbot Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Atmosphere Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Vevo Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Stingray Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Jukin Media Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Xcit Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Loop Media Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.