Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Brookfield Property Partners L P's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Brookfield Property Partners L P (BPYPP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-21.56 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-4.27 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Brookfield Property Partners L P vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 7,147M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Brookfield Property Partners L P ranks #9 of 75 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Operations industry, holding 2.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Brookfield Property Partners L P accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

BPYPP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Brookfield Property Partners L P generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BPYPP/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BPYPP/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BPYPP/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 10.9% year over year, combined, vs -21.6% for Brookfield Property Partners L P. Brookfield Property Partners L P's share of combined industry revenue moved from 9.77% to 6.92%, a loss of 2.86 percentage points.

Brookfield Property Partners L P's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Brookfield Property Partners L p No No No No
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 0% 0% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 89% 100% 75% 38%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 33.30 % (2 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Brookfield Property Partners L P100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Brookfield Property Partners L P and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Brookfield Property Partners L P's full market share breakdown »

BPYPP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

BPYPP Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Brookfield Property Partners L P's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
10%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 10)
42.9%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Brookfield Property Partners L p -2.70 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Brookfield Property Partners L P's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

BPYPP Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

BPYPP High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

BPYPP Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

BPYPP Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

BPYPP Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

BPYPP Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Brookfield Property Partners L P's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The competitive landscape includes Brookfield and its affiliates, such as the BPY General Partner and other Brookfield Accounts. These entities have investment mandates that overlap with and may compete against the partnership's activities. Brookfield Accounts typically have priority over the partnership in investment opportunities aligned with their mandates. The limited partnership agreement permits affiliates of the BPY General Partner to engage in competing activities and limits their fiduciary duties, allowing conflicts of interest to be managed in ways that may not favor preferred unitholders.

Brookfield Property Partners L P's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
BPY General Partner Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Brookfield Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Brookfield Property Partners L P's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.