Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Aurora Gold's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Aurora Gold (ARXG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of 2014
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-11.59 %
2014
Net Margin
-18,768.88 %
2014

Key Findings: Aurora Gold vs Its Competitors

  • Peer revenue share: Aurora Gold accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ARXG Sales vs. its Competitors, 2014

Aurora Gold generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARXG/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARXG/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARXG/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Metal Mining industry grew revenue 20.4% year over year, combined, vs -11.6% for Aurora Gold. Aurora Gold's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Aurora Gold's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Aurora Gold Corp - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 0% 100% 100% 50%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, 2014

100%market share
  • Aurora Gold100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Aurora Gold and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Aurora Gold's full market share breakdown »

ARXG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ARXG Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Aurora Gold's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 2)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Aurora Gold Corp - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Aurora Gold's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ARXG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

ARXG High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

Aurora Gold's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Aurora Cannabis Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Luminar Technologies Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Aurora Gold's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.