Western Midstream Partners Lp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Western Midstream Partners Lp (WES) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Western Midstream Partners Lp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4,332M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Western Midstream Partners Lp ranks #15 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 1.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Western Midstream Partners Lp accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
- Structure: Western Midstream Partners Lp reports the following subsidiaries: Western Midstream Operating, LP.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WES Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Western Midstream Partners Lp generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 42.9% year over year, combined, vs 30.0% for Western Midstream Partners Lp. Western Midstream Partners Lp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.45% to 0.41%, a loss of 0.04 percentage points.
Western Midstream Partners Lp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Midstream Partners Lp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.