Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Tristate Capital Holdings Inc (TSC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Tristate Capital Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 253M vs 866,254M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-24.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Tristate Capital Holdings Inc generated 30.8% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs -4.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 31.8% net margin compares with 25.7% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Tristate Capital Holdings Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.32M compares with $0.50M for the peer group (2.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TSC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc reported revenue growth of 30.82 % year on year in Q1 2022, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -4.11 %.
With a net margin of 31.76 %, Tristate Capital Holdings Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (25.71 %).
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc generated 0.04 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Tristate Capital Holdings Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Tristate Capital Holdings Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Regional Banks industry grew revenue 7.8% year over year, combined, vs 30.8% for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc. Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.04%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (223) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TSC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TSC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Old Point Financial Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Optimumbank Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Community Ban corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Lionsgate Studios Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Bank Of The James Financial Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our management believes that our most direct competition for deposits comes from commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market funds and brokerage firms, particularly national and large regional banks, which target the same customers we do. Competition for deposit products is generally based on pricing because of the ease with which customers can transfer deposits from one institution to another. Our cost of funds fluctuates with market interest rates and our ability to further reduce our cost of funds may be affected by higher rates being offered by other financial institutions. During certain interest rate environments, additional significant competition for deposits may be expected to arise from corporate and government debt securities and money market mutual funds.
Our competition in making loans comes principally from national, regional and large community banks, insurance companies and full service brokerage firms. Many large national and regional commercial banks have a significant number of branch offices in the areas in which we operate. Aggressive pricing policies and terms of our competitors on middle-market and private banking loans, especially during a period of prolonged low interest rates, may result in a decrease in our loan origination volume and a decrease in our yield on loans. We compete for loans principally through the quality of products and service we provide to middle-market customers and private banking referral relationships, while maintaining competitive interest rates, loan fees and other loan terms.
Our relationship-based approach to business also enables us to compete with other financial institutions in attracting loans and deposits. Our relationship managers and regional presidents have significant experience in the banking industry in the markets they serve and are focused on customer service. By capitalizing on this experience and by tailoring our products and services to the specific needs of our clients, we have been successful in cultivating stable relationships with our customers and also with financial intermediaries who refer their clients to us for banking services. We believe our approach to customer relationships will assist us in continuing to compete effectively for loans and deposits in our primary markets and nationally through our private banking channel.
The investment management business is intensely competitive. In the markets
where we compete, there are over 1,000 firms which we consider to be primary
competitors. In addition to competition from other institutional investment
management firms, Chartwell, along with the active-management industry, competes
with passive index funds, exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and investment
alternatives such as hedge funds. We compete for investment management business
by delivering excellent investment performance with a committed customer service
model.
Publicly Traded Peers of Tristate Capital Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | 1,002.25 | 253.25 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 898,596.53 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 367,554.74 | 121,098.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 251,502.28 | 83,940.00 |
| Citigroup inc | 216,156.96 | 88,262.00 |
| Capital one financial corp | 124,114.41 | 51,099.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,820,011.55 | 876,475.81 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Sources: Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Tristate Capital Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Tristate Capital Holdings Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| The Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Wvs Financial Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Customers Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Quaint Oak Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Embassy Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| M and t Bank Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Cb Financial Services Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Essa Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Penns Woods Bancorp inc | Company report | 85% |
| Acnb Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Citizens Financial Services Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Norwood Financial Corp | Company report | 85% |
| S and t Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| First Keystone Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Cnb Financial Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Republic First Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Qnb Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Franklin Financial Services Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Bryn Mawr Bank Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Citizens and Northern Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Orrstown Financial Services Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Merchants Bancorp | Company report | 85% |
| Pcsb Financial Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| C1 Financial, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Century Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Codorus Valley Bancorp Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sb Financial Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Cape Bancorp, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Fb Financial Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Farmers National Banc Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Valley National Bancorp | Company report | 85% |
| Two River Bancorp | Company report | 85% |
| Home Bancshares Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Northern Trust Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Zions Bancorporation National Association | Company report | 85% |
| William Penn Bancorporation | Company report | 85% |
| Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Tompkins Financial Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Orange County Bancorp inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Tristate Capital Holdings Inc reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| D r Horton Inc | HomeBuildingOps 94.14 % |
| First Citizens Bancshares Inc | Commercial Bank 46.42 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Florida 26.99 % |
| Lennar Corp | Homebuilding West 32.20 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | 1,002 | 1,319,005 | 434,901 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 898,597 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 367,555 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 251,502 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| Citigroup inc | 216,157 | 390,540 | 72,049 |
| Capital one financial corp | 124,114 | 669,712 | 137,615 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,819,009 | 504,708 | 132,406 |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Lionsgate Studios Corp | UNITED STATES 64.70 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Regional Banks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (2 companies). See the full Regional Banks industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 56.54 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 50.09 % | 50.49 % (avg) | -0.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.65 % | 2.34 % (avg) | +2.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Regional Banks industry average (2 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Regional Banks industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.3x | - | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.5x | - | - |
| P/B | 1.3x | - | - |
| Return on Equity | 10.17 % | industry aggregate | -1.07 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.68 % | 4.16 % (avg) | 0.52 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 46.85 % | 18.57 % | 16.50 % | 15.32 % | 16.25 % | 11.94 % | -2.80 % | 34.96 % |
| Operating Margin | - | 32.28 % | - | 34.17 % | 85.37 % | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 4.13 % | - | 4.40 % | 11.15 % | 4.43 % | 3.09 % | 4.50 % |
| P/E | - | 15.4x | 20.3x | 17.9x | 12.4x | 12.6x | 11.5x | 16.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.65 % vs industry average 2.34 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc falls in the High attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.9% median pace.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-24.8% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | - | 1.07 | 0.50 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
| Citigroup inc | 0.01 | 0.40 | 1.75 |
| Capital one financial corp | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.39 |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | Q1 2022 | +30.8 % | +33.6 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | +14.1 % | +44.6 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | +1,392.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +24.0 % | +54.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | Q1 2022 | +151.3 % | +66.8 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | - | -6.7 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | -73.8 % | -8.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | 0.66% | 6.68% | 10.17% |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
| Citigroup inc | 0.61% | 0.65% | 7.62% |
| Capital one financial corp | 1.56% | 3.24% | 9.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Tristate Capital Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Tristate Capital Holdings Inc | 16.53 | 3.96 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.04 | 4.82 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 11.61 | 3.04 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.96 | 3.00 |
| Citigroup inc | 15.14 | 2.45 |
| Capital one financial corp | 11.89 | 2.43 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 12.26 | 3.22 |
Sign in to see all peers for Tristate Capital Holdings Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.