Trio Petroleum's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Trio Petroleum (TPET) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Trio Petroleum vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 185,260M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+63.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+23.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Trio Petroleum generated 81.2% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 32.0% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -565.6% net margin compares with 32.1% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Trio Petroleum accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.85M compares with $5.33M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TPET Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Trio Petroleum reported revenue growth of 81.18 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 31.98 %.
With a net margin of -565.56 %, Trio Petroleum reported lower profitability than its competitors (32.07 %).
Trio Petroleum generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Trio Petroleum vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Trio Petroleum reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Trio Petroleum and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Trio Petroleum's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.2% year over year, combined, vs 81.2% for Trio Petroleum. Trio Petroleum's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Trio Petroleum's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | - | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (58) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TPET Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Laredo Oil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Apa Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Riley Exploration Permian Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Trio Petroleum's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Trio Petroleum's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Trio Petroleum Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Trio Petroleum Corp |
8.08 | 0.85 |
 Eog Resources Inc |
77,480.46 | 29,728.00 |
 Occidental Petroleum Corporation |
56,440.27 | 21,671.00 |
 Diamondback Energy Inc |
50,101.76 | 17,102.00 |
 Devon Energy Corp |
39,856.00 | 19,676.00 |
 Eqt Corporation |
31,401.97 | 9,347.14 |
| SUBTOTAL | 440,588.52 | 196,469.12 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Trio Petroleum Corp.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Trio Petroleum Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Trio Petroleum's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Trio Petroleum reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Diamondback Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Apa Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Pioneer Natural Resources Co | Company report | 85% |
| Coterra Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Trio Petroleum's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Trio Petroleum's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Eog Resources Inc | United States of America 98.40 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Oil and gas 95.12 % |
| Eqt Corporation | Upstream 92.08 % |
| Expand Energy Corporation | Marketing 83.93 % |
| Texas Pacific Land Corporation | Land and resource management 73.73 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Trio Petroleum's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | 8 | 851,280 | -7,067,544 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 77,480 | 8,743,529 | 2,407,647 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 56,440 | 2,081,348 | 702,171 |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 50,102 | 9,706,016 | 1,035,187 |
| Devon Energy Corp | 39,856 | 8,943,636 | 1,493,636 |
| Eqt Corporation | 31,402 | 6,137,322 | 1,832,183 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 440,580 | 5,326,509 | 987,590 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Trio Petroleum's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 50.83 % |
| Granite Ridge Resources Inc | Permian 97.40 % |
| Gran Tierra Energy Inc | Colombia 61.41 % |
| Us Energy Corp | Rockies 84.98 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Trio Petroleum's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 112 companies in Trio Petroleum's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Trio Petroleum ranks #0 of 112 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 790, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 297,053 | 18.65 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 210,732 | 13.23 % |
| 3 | Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | 135,821 | 8.53 % |
| 4 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 105,828 | 6.64 % |
| 5 | Eni Spa | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Trio Petroleum Corp | 41 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Trio Petroleum's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-09.
Trio Petroleum's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (246 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.81 % | 26.14 % (avg) | -7.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 18.57 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 27.52 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Trio Petroleum's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (246 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 16.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 9.1x | - |
| P/B | 0.1x | 1.9x | -1.8x |
| Return on Equity | -30.19 % | industry aggregate | -42.26 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -14.55 % | 0.95 % (avg) | -15.50 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Trio Petroleum's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | 127.70 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -7.36 % | -32.85 % | -21.32 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Trio Petroleum's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 790 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Trio Petroleum's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Trio Petroleum's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+63.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 42.3 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Trio Petroleum's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | 7.96 | 8.33 | 0.01 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 0.85 | 1.78 | 0.25 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 0.34 | 1.11 | 0.57 |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 0.07 | 0.51 | 0.33 |
| Devon Energy Corp | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0.43 |
| Eqt Corporation | 0.08 | 0.70 | 0.11 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trio Petroleum's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | Q2 2026 | +81.2 % | - |
| Eog Resources Inc | Q3 2026 | +46.2 % | +89.1 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Q2 2026 | +53.4 % | +540.2 % |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +51.2 % | +178.1 % |
| Devon Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +73.1 % | +108.4 % |
| Eqt Corporation | Q3 2026 | -9.6 % | -31.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +29.9 % | +101.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trio Petroleum's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | Q2 2026 | +144.1 % | -89.3 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | Q3 2026 | - | -4.0 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | -6.8 % |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -64.1 % |
| Devon Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | - | +37.9 % |
| Eqt Corporation | Q3 2026 | -1.7 % | +3.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
Trio Petroleum's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | - | - | - |
| Eog Resources Inc | 15.13% | 18.55% | 26.05% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 8.90% | 8.31% | 18.83% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 2.54% | 2.17% | 4.16% |
| Devon Energy Corp | 7.91% | 9.69% | 14.93% |
| Eqt Corporation | 6.71% | 5.99% | 9.79% |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Trio Petroleum's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp | - | 9.49 |
| Eog Resources Inc | 9.60 | 2.61 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 8.63 | 2.60 |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 34.13 | 2.93 |
| Devon Energy Corp | 10.09 | 2.03 |
| Eqt Corporation | 12.08 | 3.36 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 12.10 | 2.24 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trio Petroleum Corp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.