Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Logistic Properties Of The Americas's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Logistic Properties Of The Americas (LPA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
14.29 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
32.13 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Logistic Properties Of The Americas vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 50M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Logistic Properties Of The Americas ranks #51 of 75 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Operations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Logistic Properties Of The Americas accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

LPA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Logistic Properties Of The Americas generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPA/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPA/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LPA/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 10.9% year over year, combined, vs 14.3% for Logistic Properties Of The Americas. Logistic Properties Of The Americas's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.05% to 0.05%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Logistic Properties Of The Americas's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Logistic Properties Of The Americas Yes Yes Yes No
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 33% 33% 11% 63%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 14.30 % (1 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Logistic Properties Of The Americas100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Logistic Properties Of The Americas and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Logistic Properties Of The Americas's full market share breakdown »

LPA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

LPA Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Logistic Properties Of The Americas's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 8)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Logistic Properties Of The Americas -50.90 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Logistic Properties Of The Americas's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

LPA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

LPA Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

LPA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

LPA Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Logistic Properties Of The Americas's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

LPA operates in the industrial property markets of Costa Rica, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico, where it faces competition from various investors, developers, and operators. Notable competitors include Grupo Montecristo and Mobilaire, Inc. in Costa Rica; Aldea Logistica Global S.A.C. in Peru; and Megacentro and Bodegas San Francisco Inmobiliaria Alquife S.A.C., which own industrial assets in Peru and Chile. LPA also competes with local real estate investment trusts (REITs) that own industrial properties in Costa Rica and Mexico. Future competition may come from other regional market participants or new entrants.

Logistic Properties Of The Americas's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Megacentro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bodegas San Francisco Inmobiliaria Alquife S.A.C. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mobilaire, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Grupo Montecristo Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aldea Logistica Global S.A.C. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Logistic Properties Of The Americas's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.