Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8M vs 4,992M combined for its competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+10.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc generated 0.9% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 27.8% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 60.3% net margin compares with 10.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc ranks #164 of 187 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.36M compares with $0.69M for the peer group (2.0x).
- Structure: Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc reports the following subsidiaries: MBC FUNDING II CORP..
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LOAN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc reported revenue growth of 0.87 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 27.78 %.
With a net margin of 60.31 %, Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (10.43 %).
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc generated 0.15 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.19 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -1.0% year over year, combined, vs 0.9% for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc. Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 14.30 % (1 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LOAN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LOAN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LOAN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LOAN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enova International Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Onemain Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Lendingtree inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Sofi Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Upstart Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc |
38.11 | 8.17 |
 Sofi Technologies Inc |
21,915.76 | 4,305.70 |
 Onemain Holdings Inc |
6,577.82 | 2,975.00 |
 Enova International Inc |
4,559.34 | 3,652.63 |
 Upstart Holdings Inc |
2,745.25 | 1,339.53 |
 Lendingtree inc |
520.14 | 1,268.17 |
| SUBTOTAL | 36,356.42 | 13,549.20 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Valley National Bank | Company report | 85% |
| Webster | Company report | 85% |
| Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Flushing Bank | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Lendingtree inc | Insurance 68.38 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 38 | 1,361,335 | 798,021 |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | 21,916 | 705,852 | 104,306 |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | 6,578 | 319,892 | 85,591 |
| Enova International Inc | 4,559 | 1,989,451 | 208,302 |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | 2,745 | 953,405 | 73,415 |
| Lendingtree inc | 520 | 1,369,513 | 196,178 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 36,318 | 692,034 | 107,299 |
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Enova International Inc | US 97.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 181 companies in Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc ranks #164 of 181 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 413, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welltower Inc | 180,807 | 12.02 % |
| 2 | Prologis Inc | 121,613 | 8.09 % |
| 3 | Equinix Inc | 100,396 | 6.67 % |
| 4 | American Tower Corporation | 88,026 | 5.85 % |
| 5 | Simon Property Group inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Public Storage | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Realty Income Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ventas inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Crown Castle Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 164 | Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 38 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | Global Self Storage Inc | 55 | -1.01 % |
| 160 | Clipper Realty Inc | 53 | -15.32 % |
| 161 | Anfield Energy Inc | 46 | -59.68 % |
| 162 | Franklin Street Properties Corp | 45 | -64.29 % |
| 163 | Sachem Capital Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 164 | Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 38 | -31.56 % |
| 165 | Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 166 | Site Centers Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 167 | Health In Tech Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 168 | Bimini Capital Management Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 169 | Bluerock Homes Trust inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (283 companies). See the full Real Estate Investment Trusts industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 42.02 % (avg) | -42.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 58.42 % | industry median | +20.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 70.96 % | 38.49 % (avg) | +32.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 28.31 % (avg) | -28.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry average (283 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Real Estate Investment Trusts industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 9.9x | 30.7x | -20.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.2x | 17.6x | -6.4x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 1.9x | -0.8x |
| Return on Equity | 11.14 % | industry aggregate | 5.15 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.50 % | 2.23 % (avg) | 2.27 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 22.06 % | 1.59 % | -4.54 % | -5.40 % | 25.41 % | 14.30 % | -1.10 % | -10.55 % |
| Operating Margin | 58.16 % | 61.28 % | 60.09 % | 62.50 % | 60.60 % | 55.56 % | 57.53 % | 58.78 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.17 % | 5.03 % | 4.66 % | 5.73 % | 4.49 % | 7.68 % | 5.90 % | 4.56 % |
| P/E | 12.3x | 13.5x | 11.4x | 14.0x | 12.8x | 9.7x | 11.4x | 11.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Strategic Group Map
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -24.9% and operating margin of 58.4% compares with an average of -14.0% growth and 54.1% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 2.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 413 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 28.31 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 20.5 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 5.2 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (9.9x vs 30.7x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 1.08 | 333.90 | 0.43 |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | 1.38 | 40.44 | 6.64 |
| Enova International Inc | 0.23 | 1.16 | 3.40 |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | 3.82 | 14.38 | 2.42 |
| Lendingtree inc | 0.57 | 1.69 | 1.50 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | Q3 2026 | +0.9 % | +3.0 % |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +42.5 % | +61.0 % |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | +9.5 % | +6.1 % |
| Enova International Inc | Q3 2026 | +25.7 % | +33.6 % |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | Q3 2026 | +33.7 % | -42.6 % |
| Lendingtree inc | Q2 2026 | +25.3 % | +8.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +27.3 % | +15.7 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | Q3 2026 | - | - |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +33.0 % | +52.2 % |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | +2.0 % | - |
| Enova International Inc | Q3 2026 | - | +2.5 % |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | Q3 2026 | - | +37.1 % |
| Lendingtree inc | Q2 2026 | +12.4 % | +15.3 % |
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 7.60% | 7.60% | 11.14% |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | 1.21% | 2.61% | 6.18% |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | 2.95% | 2.95% | 23.62% |
| Enova International Inc | 5.41% | 5.76% | 26.36% |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | 3.31% | 3.36% | 12.83% |
| Lendingtree inc | 21.43% | 24.24% | 69.56% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 7.99 | 4.67 |
| Sofi Technologies Inc | 33.08 | 5.09 |
| Onemain Holdings Inc | 8.36 | 2.21 |
| Enova International Inc | 11.92 | 1.25 |
| Upstart Holdings Inc | 35.89 | 2.05 |
| Lendingtree inc | 2.86 | 0.41 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 17.28 | 2.68 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.