Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Naturalshrimp Incorporated's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Naturalshrimp Incorporated (SHMP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-0.05 %
Q1 2025
Net Margin
-7,994.26 %
Q1 2025

Key Findings: Naturalshrimp Incorporated vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-27.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Naturalshrimp Incorporated accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SHMP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025

Naturalshrimp Incorporated generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SHMP/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SHMP/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SHMP/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs -0.1% for Naturalshrimp Incorporated. Naturalshrimp Incorporated's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Naturalshrimp Incorporated's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Naturalshrimp Incorporated No No No Yes
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 7) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 66.70 % (4 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2025

100%market share
  • Naturalshrimp Incorporated100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Naturalshrimp Incorporated and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Naturalshrimp Incorporated's full market share breakdown »

SHMP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SHMP Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

SHMP Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SHMP Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Naturalshrimp Incorporated's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

There are a number of companies conducting research and development projects in their attempt to develop closed-system technologies in the U.S., some with reported production and sales. Florida Organic Aquaculture uses a Bio-Floc Raceway System to intensify shrimp growth, while Marvesta Shrimp Farms tanks in water from the Atlantic and use in their indoor system. Since these are privately-held companies, it is not possible to know, with certainty, their state of technical development, production capacity, need for water exchange, location requirements, financial status and other matters. To the best of our knowledge, none are producing significant quantities of shrimp relative to their local markets, and such fresh shrimp sales are likely confined to an area near the production facility.


Additionally, any new competitor would face significant barriers for entry into the market and would likely need years of research and development to develop the proprietary technology necessary to produce similar shrimp at a commercially viable level. We believe our technology and business model sets us apart from any current competition. It is possible that additional competitors will arise in the future, but with the size and growth of the worldwide shrimp market, many competitors could co-exist and thrive in the fresh shrimp industry.