Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Prf Technologies Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Prf Technologies Ltd (PRFX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
2
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.05 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Peers: 112.40 %
Net Margin
-29,541.18 %
Peers: 56.22 %

Key Findings: Prf Technologies Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 142M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-11.5%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Profitability: Its -29,541.2% net margin compares with 56.2% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Prf Technologies Ltd ranks #475 of 544 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Prf Technologies Ltd accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.00M compares with $2.02M for the peer group (0.0x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PRFX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

With a net margin of -29,541.18 %, Prf Technologies Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (56.22 %).

Prf Technologies Ltd generated 0.05 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PRFX/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PRFX/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PRFX/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Prf Technologies Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Net margin

Prf Technologies Ltd -29,541.2 %
Competitors combined +56.2 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Prf Technologies Ltd +300.0 %
Competitors combined -11.5 %

TTM net margin

Prf Technologies Ltd -29,541.2 %
Competitors combined +35.1 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Prf Technologies Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Prf Technologies Ltd $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Prf Technologies Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Prf Technologies Ltd - - - Yes
Competitors combined (2) 50% 50% 50% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 0% 40% 20% 67%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

0.1%market share
  • Prf Technologies Ltd0.1%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Prf Technologies Ltd and its 2 tracked competitors.

See Prf Technologies Ltd's full market share breakdown »

PRFX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PRFX Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Prf Technologies Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(1 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Prf Technologies Ltd -85.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (2) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Prf Technologies Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PRFX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

PRFX Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Nutriband Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Prf Technologies Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Publicly Traded Peers of Prf Technologies Ltd

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Prf Technologies Ltd 0.65 0.02 -5.02 7
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 279.01 140.13 56.67 65
Nutriband Inc 107.52 1.62 -6.96 5
SUBTOTAL 387.18 141.76 44.68 77

Sources: Prf Technologies Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Prf Technologies Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Prf Technologies Ltd 1 2,429 -717,429
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 279 2,155,840 871,815
Nutriband Inc 108 323,536 -1,392,589
PEERS TOTAL 387 2,024,961 710,072

Prf Technologies Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Prf Technologies Ltd Solar By Business Segments 100.00 % - -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Prf Technologies Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 498 companies in Prf Technologies Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Prf Technologies Ltd ranks #475 of 498 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 827, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Eli Lilly And Company 1,062,533 19.39 %
2 Johnson and Johnson 664,610 12.13 %
3 Beone Medicines Ltd 545,679 9.96 %
4 Abbvie Inc 467,633 8.54 %
5 Merck and Co Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Novartis Ag 1,234 5.2%
7 Abbott Laboratories 1,234 5.2%
8 Novo Nordisk A 1,234 5.2%
9 Pfizer Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1,234 5.2%
475 Prf Technologies Ltd 1 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Prf Technologies Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
470 Bioxcel Therapeutics Inc 1 - - 1.89 -1.60
471 Sunshine Biopharma Inc 1 -94.63 % -61.28 % 1.37 -1.58
472 Evofem Biosciences Inc 1 -45.00 % -14.44 % -0.12 0.22
473 Skinvisible Inc 1 - - -1.82 1.06
474 Zyversa Therapeutics Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
475 Prf Technologies Ltd 1 -85.47 % -25.74 % 1.46 -0.42
476 Cdt Equity Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
477 Actavia Life Sciences Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
478 Jaguar Health Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
479 The Greater Cannabis Company Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
480 Purple Biotech Ltd 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Prf Technologies Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry average (341 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 25.1x -
EV / EBITDA - 17.3x -
P/B 0.4x 4.5x -4.1x
Return on Equity -58.78 % industry aggregate -85.03 %
Return on Invested Capital -28.29 % -2.95 % (avg) -25.34 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 202320242025
Revenue Growth ---
Operating Margin ---
Return on Invested Capital -66.20 %-397.32 %-28.29 %
P/E ---

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Prf Technologies Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Prf Technologies Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Prf Technologies Ltd

Prf Technologies Ltd falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.0% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 827 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry High (capital intensive) Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 11.76 % vs industry average 4.92 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Prf Technologies Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Prf Technologies Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest Prf Technologies Ltd

Prf Technologies Ltd falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Prf Technologies Ltd's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Return on equity 85.0 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-11.5% annualized).
  • High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Prf Technologies Ltd 1.72 1.78 - 0.00
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.52 5.26 0.04 1.14
Nutriband Inc 5.25 5.76 0.03 0.22

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Prf Technologies Ltd Q4 2025----
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc Q2 2026-17.5 %-20.6 %--68.0 %
Nutriband Inc Q2 2026-29.7 %+0.9 %--
PEERS TOTAL-17.7 %-20.3 %--99.7 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Prf Technologies Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Prf Technologies Ltd Q4 2025---84.6 %-84.6 %
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc Q2 2026+57.1 %-5.6 %+270.7 %-
Nutriband Inc Q2 2026-45.1 %+8.0 %--

Prf Technologies Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Prf Technologies Ltd -----
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 46.11%53.48%71.10%3.113.95
Nutriband Inc ---22.157.92

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Prf Technologies Ltd's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Prf Technologies Ltd -38.50--0.08
Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.941.99-16.202.66
Nutriband Inc -66.47--20.18
PEERS AVERAGE8.672.7330.913.26

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.