Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Polar Power Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Polar Power Inc (POLA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-47.20 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-179.69 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Polar Power Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-23.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Polar Power Inc ranks #121 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Polar Power Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

POLA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Polar Power Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/POLA/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/POLA/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/POLA/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs -47.2% for Polar Power Inc. Polar Power Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Polar Power Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Polar Power Inc No No No Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 25% 67% 67% 50%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Polar Power Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Polar Power Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Polar Power Inc's full market share breakdown »

POLA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

POLA Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Polar Power Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
28.6%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(2 of 7)
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Polar Power Inc -62.70 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Polar Power Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

POLA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

POLA High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

POLA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

POLA Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

POLA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

POLA Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Polar Power Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company develops proprietary DC power systems characterized by high fuel efficiency, lightweight, and compact design. Unlike competitors who adapt legacy AC generators with conversion equipment, the company's systems maintain higher efficiency. Their products have received certification from four Tier-1 telecommunications operators in the United States. The company has established international offices in Poland, Romania, Australia, and South Africa. The U.S. market features a reduced number of competitors due to stringent certification requirements imposed by Tier-1 telecommunications customers. The company emphasizes low total cost of ownership, long equipment lifespan, and environmentally friendly technology. It is expanding sales to Tier-2 telecommunications customers and off-grid markets while developing new LPG and natural gas DC power systems to enhance economic competitiveness against providers of AC power systems.

Polar Power Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Garmin Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Polar Power Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.