Marwynn Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Marwynn Holdings Inc (MWYN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Marwynn Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+45.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Marwynn Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MWYN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Marwynn Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Grocery Stores industry grew revenue 4.1% year over year, combined, vs 2,546.7% for Marwynn Holdings Inc. Marwynn Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Marwynn Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marwynn Holdings, Inc. | No | No | No | No |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 14.30 % (1 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MWYN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MWYN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Marwynn Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Marwynn Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bibigo (Schwan’s Consumer Brands, Inc.) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Grand Forest | Named by the company | 85% |
| Anjinomoto Co., Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Royal Asia (Tai Foong USA, Inc.) | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Marwynn Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.