La Rosa Holdings's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of La Rosa Holdings (LRHC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: La Rosa Holdings vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 62M vs 32,826M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: La Rosa Holdings generated -25.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 10.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -14.3% net margin compares with 2.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: La Rosa Holdings ranks #67 of 75 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Operations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: La Rosa Holdings accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.3% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LRHC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
La Rosa Holdings reported revenue contraction of 25.60 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.57 %.
With a net margin of -14.32 %, La Rosa Holdings reported lower profitability than its competitors (2.42 %).
La Rosa Holdings generated 0.18 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.26 % a year earlier.
La Rosa Holdings vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across La Rosa Holdings and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across La Rosa Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 10.9% year over year, combined, vs -25.6% for La Rosa Holdings. La Rosa Holdings's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.01%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
La Rosa Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LRHC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LRHC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LRHC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LRHC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redfin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Exp World Holdings inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Fathom Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for La Rosa Holdings's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
La Rosa Holdings's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of La Rosa Holdings Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | 0.59 | 62.27 |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,739.14 | 27,433.50 |
| Redfin Corporation | 1,423.01 | 1,038.02 |
| Exp World Holdings inc | 583.23 | 4,963.62 |
| Paid Inc | 21.20 | 22.35 |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | 17.96 | 406.93 |
| SUBTOTAL | 16,785.13 | 33,926.69 |
Sources: La Rosa Holdings Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on La Rosa Holdings Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
La Rosa Holdings's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Fathom Holdings Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| eXp World Holdings Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Century 21 | Named by the company | 85% |
| Realogy Holdings Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Coldwell Banker | Named by the company | 85% |
| RE/MAX | Named by the company | 85% |
| Redfin Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Paid Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for La Rosa Holdings's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
La Rosa Holdings's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Real Estate Management Services 79.32 % |
| Redfin Corporation | Real Estate 57.23 % |
| Exp World Holdings inc | North American Realty 96.79 % |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | Real Estate Brokerage 94.14 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
La Rosa Holdings's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | 1 | - | - |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 14,739 | 242,774 | 8,831 |
| Redfin Corporation | 1,423 | 221,185 | -40,602 |
| Exp World Holdings inc | 583 | - | - |
| Paid Inc | 21 | 744,996 | 4,298 |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | 18 | 1,448,157 | -90,769 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 16,785 | 286,977 | 6,481 |
La Rosa Holdings's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 68 companies in La Rosa Holdings's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.La Rosa Holdings ranks #67 of 68 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,411, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Airbnb Inc | 92,326 | 28.70 % |
| 2 | Ke Holdings inc | 58,348 | 18.14 % |
| 3 | Cbre Group Inc | 37,974 | 11.81 % |
| 4 | Api Group Corporation | 16,694 | 5.19 % |
| 5 | Invitation Homes Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rollins Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Terreno Realty Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Brookfield Property Partners L p | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Firstservice Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 67 | La Rosa Holdings Corp | 1 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of La Rosa Holdings's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
La Rosa Holdings's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | Regional Health Properties Inc | 4 | -45.48 % |
| 63 | My City Builders Inc | 2 | - |
| 64 | Ohmyhome Limited | 1 | 92.34 % |
| 65 | Hubilu Venture Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 66 | Green Stream Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 67 | La Rosa Holdings Corp | 1 | -99.61 % |
| 68 | Advanced Oxygen Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of La Rosa Holdings's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
La Rosa Holdings's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Operations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (71 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 52.77 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -26.62 % | industry median | -30.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -41.37 % | 16.25 % (avg) | -57.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 17.17 % (avg) | -17.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
La Rosa Holdings's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Operations industry average (71 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 31.1x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 15.2x | - |
| P/B | -0.1x | 3.1x | -3.1x |
| Return on Equity | 651.33 % | industry aggregate | 643.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -145.52 % | 2.12 % (avg) | -147.64 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
La Rosa Holdings's Strategic Group Map
Every company in La Rosa Holdings's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. La Rosa Holdings is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
La Rosa Holdings's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs La Rosa Holdings's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
La Rosa Holdings falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
La Rosa Holdings's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,411 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 17.17 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See La Rosa Holdings's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See La Rosa Holdings's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
La Rosa Holdings's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
La Rosa Holdings falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
La Rosa Holdings's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 643.8 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 30.6 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
La Rosa Holdings's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | 0.31 | 1.28 | - |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 0.07 | 1.11 | 0.20 |
| Redfin Corporation | 0.48 | 1.31 | - |
| Exp World Holdings inc | 0.53 | 1.51 | - |
| Paid Inc | 0.50 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | 0.14 | 1.00 | 0.20 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
La Rosa Holdings's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | Q2 2026 | +2.8 % | - |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +10.8 % | +93.9 % |
| Redfin Corporation | Q1 2025 | -1.9 % | - |
| Exp World Holdings inc | Q2 2026 | +10.7 % | - |
| Paid Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.8 % | - |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.6 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.2 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
La Rosa Holdings's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | Q2 2026 | +0.6 % | - |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | Q2 2026 | - | +12.8 % |
| Redfin Corporation | Q1 2025 | -2.6 % | -9.1 % |
| Exp World Holdings inc | Q2 2026 | - | -4.9 % |
| Paid Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.0 % | -54.0 % |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -49.5 % |
La Rosa Holdings's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | - | - | - |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 5.68% | 9.47% | 13.33% |
| Redfin Corporation | - | - | - |
| Exp World Holdings inc | - | - | - |
| Paid Inc | 1.54% | 2.06% | 2.34% |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
La Rosa Holdings's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| La Rosa Holdings Corp | - | 0.01 |
| Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 15.07 | 0.54 |
| Redfin Corporation | - | 1.37 |
| Exp World Holdings inc | - | 0.12 |
| Paid Inc | - | 0.95 |
| Fathom Holdings Inc | - | 0.04 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 22.81 | 0.49 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.