Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Lobo Technologies Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lobo Technologies Ltd (LOBO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
9.58 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-23.59 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Lobo Technologies Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 23M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Lobo Technologies Ltd ranks #49 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Auto & Truck Parts industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Lobo Technologies Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

LOBO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Lobo Technologies Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LOBO/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LOBO/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/LOBO/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Auto & Truck Parts industry grew revenue 4.6% year over year, combined, vs 9.6% for Lobo Technologies Ltd. Lobo Technologies Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Lobo Technologies Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Lobo Technologies Ltd No Yes Yes No
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 20% 43% 29% 29%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 57.10 % (4 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Lobo Technologies Ltd100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Lobo Technologies Ltd and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Lobo Technologies Ltd's full market share breakdown »

LOBO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

LOBO Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Lobo Technologies Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 6)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Lobo Technologies Ltd -13.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lobo Technologies Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

LOBO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

LOBO Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

LOBO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

LOBO Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Lobo Technologies Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the competitive market for e-bicycles, e-tricycles, e-carts, and AI-related products and services. As a new entrant, it faces competition from established industry leaders. The company must continuously develop and introduce new products to maintain its market position but encounters risks including technical, operational, logistical, and regulatory challenges that may delay product launches. Additionally, large manufacturers such as AIMA Technology Group Co., LTD and Yadea Group Holdings Ltd. have introduced low-end, low-cost models targeting low-income workers in China, increasing competitive pressure.

Lobo Technologies Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Standardization Work Committee of the China Electrotechnical Society Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Guangzhou LOBO Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Wuxi Jinbang Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Jiangsu WFOE Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AIMA Technology Group Co., LTD Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Yadea Group Holdings Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lobo Technologies Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.