Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Excelerate Energy Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Excelerate Energy Inc (EE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
60.97 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
15.21 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Excelerate Energy Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,471M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-10.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Excelerate Energy Inc ranks #39 of 49 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Excelerate Energy Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

EE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Excelerate Energy Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/EE/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/EE/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/EE/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 24.5% year over year, combined, vs 61.0% for Excelerate Energy Inc. Excelerate Energy Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.09% to 0.11%, a gain of 0.03 percentage points.

Excelerate Energy Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Excelerate Energy Inc Yes Yes Yes -
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 67% 33% 33% 33%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 56% 67% 33% 43%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (6 of 6) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 16.70 % (1 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Excelerate Energy Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Excelerate Energy Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Excelerate Energy Inc's full market share breakdown »

EE Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

EE Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Excelerate Energy Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(3 of 3)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 10)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Excelerate Energy Inc 31.90 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Excelerate Energy Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

EE Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

EE High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

EE Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

EE Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

EE Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

EE Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Excelerate Energy Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the floating regasification terminal market alongside other owners, including large public integrated companies and smaller private owners. It offers fully integrated solutions and services beyond floating regasification terminals. The company also competes with other LNG-to-power developers in various markets, utilizing its expertise in floating regasification terminals and local operational experience to develop downstream infrastructure projects and LNG-to-power projects.

Excelerate Energy Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
ExxonMobil Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Qatargas Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hoegh LNG Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AES Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Shell Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
New Fortress Energy Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Excelerate Energy Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.