Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Capital Clean Energy Carriers vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 393M vs 30,411M combined for tracked competitors (1.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+124.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Capital Clean Energy Carriers generated 6.3% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs -12.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 43.5% net margin compares with 21.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Capital Clean Energy Carriers ranks #20 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Marine Transportation industry, holding 1.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Capital Clean Energy Carriers accounted for 2.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.9% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CCEC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Capital Clean Energy Carriers reported revenue growth of 6.31 % year on year in Q4 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -12.17 %.
With a net margin of 43.48 %, Capital Clean Energy Carriers achieved higher profitability than its competitors (21.85 %).
Capital Clean Energy Carriers generated 2.25 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.86 % a year earlier.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Capital Clean Energy Carriers and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Capital Clean Energy Carriers's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Marine Transportation industry grew revenue 2.3% year over year, combined, vs 6.3% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.85% to 0.88%, a gain of 0.03 percentage points.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (27) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 28.60 % (2 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CCEC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CCEC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CCEC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nordic American Tankers Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Golden Ocean Group Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Matson inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Frontline Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Navios Maritime Partners L p | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Capital Clean Energy Carriers's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 1,251.91 | 392.71 |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 24,774.13 | 12,036.00 |
| Matson inc | 6,770.54 | 3,459.20 |
| Frontline Plc | 5,354.08 | 1,971.17 |
| Golar Lng Limited | 5,342.21 | 393.52 |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | 4,690.11 | 968.42 |
| SUBTOTAL | 76,586.65 | 32,322.24 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Sources: Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Maritime | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Capital Clean Energy Carriers's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Matson inc | Ocean Transportation Segment 81.35 % |
| Golar Lng Limited | FLNG 93.19 % |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd | Tankers 86.57 % |
| Danaos Corporation | Container Vessel Segment 91.65 % |
| Costamare Inc | Container Vessels Segment 96.44 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 1,252 | - | - |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 24,774 | 601,800 | 46,067 |
| Matson inc | 6,771 | 17,296,000 | 2,319,000 |
| Frontline Plc | 5,354 | 25,599,649 | 4,923,130 |
| Golar Lng Limited | 5,342 | 504,515 | 144,328 |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | 4,690 | 649,946 | 149,808 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 75,335 | 734,333 | 122,886 |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | US 34.30 % |
| Danaos Corporation | Europe 51.61 % |
| Singularity Future Technology Ltd | CN 100.00 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 55 companies in Capital Clean Energy Carriers's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Capital Clean Energy Carriers ranks #20 of 55 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.18 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 980, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 24,521 | 22.38 % |
| 2 | C h Robinson Worldwide Inc | 17,448 | 15.93 % |
| 3 | Frontline Plc | 10,823 | 9.88 % |
| 4 | Cmb tech Nv | 4,404 | 4.02 % |
| 5 | Brink s Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Scorpio Tankers Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Torm Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Dht Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Star Bulk Carriers Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 20 | Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 1,287 | 1.18 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Capital Clean Energy Carriers's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Costamare Inc | 1,755 | 14.78 % |
| 16 | Sfl Corporation Ltd | 1,722 | 68.93 % |
| 17 | Global Ship Lease Inc | 1,601 | 39.86 % |
| 18 | Navigator Holdings Ltd | 1,570 | 39.82 % |
| 19 | Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 1,287 | -4.82 % |
| 21 | Teekay Corporation Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 22 | Genco Shipping and Trading Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 23 | Safe Bulkers Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 24 | Himalaya Shipping Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 25 | Ardmore Shipping Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Capital Clean Energy Carriers's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Marine Transportation industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (65 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 96.15 % | 47.92 % (avg) | +48.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 54.48 % | industry median | +29.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 83.10 % | 22.53 % (avg) | +60.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 80.24 % | 15.33 % (avg) | +64.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Marine Transportation industry average (65 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 7.3x | 11.0x | -3.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.6x | 7.1x | +3.5x |
| P/B | 0.8x | 1.2x | -0.3x |
| Return on Equity | 11.39 % | industry aggregate | -2.76 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.95 % | 4.43 % (avg) | -0.48 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 20.57 % | 2.45 % | 6.31 % |
| Operating Margin | 25.33 % | 48.10 % | 54.48 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 1.69 % | 3.32 % | 3.95 % |
| P/E | 6.4x | 7.2x | 7.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Capital Clean Energy Carriers's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Capital Clean Energy Carriers's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.05x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -0.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 980 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 80.24 % vs industry average 15.33 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Capital Clean Energy Carriers's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Capital Clean Energy Carriers's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 29.7 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.05x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (30.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 0.88 | 1.38 | 1.66 |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 0.56 | 1.73 | - |
| Matson inc | 0.21 | 0.86 | 0.13 |
| Frontline Plc | 0.51 | 1.43 | 1.09 |
| Golar Lng Limited | 2.12 | 2.55 | 1.66 |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | 0.55 | 1.22 | 0.75 |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | Q4 2025 | +6.3 % | -12.2 % |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | Q2 2026 | +32.1 % | +45.3 % |
| Matson inc | Q2 2026 | +16.7 % | +36.6 % |
| Frontline Plc | Q4 2025 | -8.8 % | -23.5 % |
| Golar Lng Limited | Q4 2025 | +32.2 % | +39.3 % |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | Q4 2024 | +9.3 % | +98.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +0.3 % | -4.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | Q4 2025 | +105.1 % | -73.8 % |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | Q2 2026 | +37.8 % | -24.5 % |
| Matson inc | Q2 2026 | - | +140.1 % |
| Frontline Plc | Q4 2025 | - | -98.6 % |
| Golar Lng Limited | Q4 2025 | - | -87.5 % |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | Q4 2024 | - | -99.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 4.17% | 4.35% | 11.39% |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 18.81% | 38.74% | 40.73% |
| Matson inc | 10.01% | 14.03% | 16.94% |
| Frontline Plc | 6.59% | 12.61% | 15.10% |
| Golar Lng Limited | 2.11% | 2.32% | 6.11% |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | 6.61% | 6.81% | 11.75% |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Capital Clean Energy Carriers's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp | 7.34 | 3.19 |
| Expeditors International Of Washington Inc | 27.53 | 2.06 |
| Matson inc | 15.10 | 1.96 |
| Frontline Plc | 14.12 | 2.72 |
| Golar Lng Limited | 81.32 | 13.58 |
| Golden Ocean Group Limited | 20.94 | 4.84 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.89 | 2.37 |
Sign in to see all peers for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.