Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Argo Blockchain Plc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Argo Blockchain Plc (ARBK) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2022
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-94.25 %
Q4 2022
Net Margin
-5,217.06 %
Q4 2022

Key Findings: Argo Blockchain Plc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 16M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Argo Blockchain Plc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ARBK Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2022

Argo Blockchain Plc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARBK/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARBK/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ARBK/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry grew revenue 293.3% year over year, combined, vs -94.3% for Argo Blockchain Plc. Argo Blockchain Plc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.08% to 0.00%, a loss of 0.08 percentage points.

Argo Blockchain Plc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Argo Blockchain Plc - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (8) 0% 71% 43% 60%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2022

100%market share
  • Argo Blockchain Plc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Argo Blockchain Plc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Argo Blockchain Plc's full market share breakdown »

ARBK Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ARBK Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Argo Blockchain Plc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 8)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Argo Blockchain Plc -96.00 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Argo Blockchain Plc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ARBK Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

ARBK High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 11) Percent change over the selected range

Argo Blockchain Plc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive environment involving the purchase of mining machines, leasing or developing facilities to host mining equipment, securing low-cost renewable power, providing mining advisory services, and developing blockchain technologies. Since late 2020, competition has intensified due to rising prices of Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies. The company competes based on operational efficiency, hashrate, access to reliable low-cost renewable power, and innovation. Its strategy includes balancing owned and operated mining facilities with third-party sites, securing renewable power at low prices, and investing in new technologies. Additionally, proof-of-stake networks present competition to the Bitcoin blockchain by employing less resource-intensive validation methods, which may affect companies dependent on proof-of-work mining.

Argo Blockchain Plc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Bitdeer Technologies Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
MIGI Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Big Digital Energy Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hyperscale Data Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
TZUP Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Core Scientific Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Stronghold Digital Mining Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bit Digital Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mara Holdings Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Datacentrex Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Soluna Holdings Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Argo Blockchain Plc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.