Viasat Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Viasat Inc (VSAT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Viasat Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4,626M vs 213,621M combined for tracked competitors (2.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Viasat Inc generated -1.2% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 5.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -3.7% net margin compares with 32.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Viasat Inc ranks #9 of 59 companies by market capitalization in the Consumer Electronics industry, holding 1.5% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Viasat Inc accounted for 2.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 2.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.62M compares with $0.54M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
VSAT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Viasat Inc reported revenue contraction of 1.24 % year on year in Q1 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 5.00 %.
With a net margin of -3.70 %, Viasat Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (32.62 %).
Viasat Inc generated 2.05 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 2.17 % a year earlier.
Viasat Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Viasat Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Viasat Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Consumer Electronics industry grew revenue -0.5% year over year, combined, vs -1.2% for Viasat Inc. Viasat Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.55% to 0.54%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Viasat Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (23) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
VSAT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
VSAT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
VSAT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
VSAT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sifco Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Frequency Electronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Iridium Communications Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Globalstar Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Corning Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Viasat Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Viasat Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
To compete, we emphasize:
the high-speed, high-quality and broad geographic availability of our broadband services;
our proven designs and network integration services for complex, customized network needs;
the increased bandwidth efficiency offered by our networks, products and services;
the innovative and flexible features integrated into our products and services;
our network management experience;
our end-to-end network implementation capabilities;
the distinct advantages of satellite data networks;
technical advantages and advanced features of our antenna systems as compared to our competitors’ offerings; and
the overall cost-effectiveness of our communications systems, products and services.
While we believe we compete successfully on each of these factors, we expect to continue to face intense competition in each of our markets.
In our satellite services segment, we face competition for fixed broadband services both from existing competitors and emerging technologies. Our fixed broadband service offerings compete with broadband service offerings from wireline and wireless telecommunications companies, cable companies, satellite companies and internet service providers. Many of our competitors are larger than us, have substantial capital resources, have greater brand recognition, have access to spectrum or technologies not available to us, or are able to offer bundled service offerings that we are not able to duplicate, all of which may reduce demand for our broadband services. In addition, the broadband services market continues to see industry consolidation and vertical integration, which may enable our competitors to provide competing services to broader customer segments. New entrants, some with significant financial resources, and new emerging technologies (including 5G) may compete with our broadband service offerings. Additionally, wireless telecommunications carriers such as AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon are currently offering unlimited data plans that could attract our existing and future subscribers. Our in-flight internet service offerings compete against air-to-ground mobile services and other satellite-based services, such as the services offered by Global Eagle, Gogo, Inmarsat and Panasonic Avionics Corporation. We believe that our Ka-band satellite-based in-flight internet services offer a competitive combination of high-speed and data throughput capacity, that enable commercial airlines to offer more passengers on more flights the ability to enjoy high-speed broadband services such as streaming video.
In our commercial networks segment, we compete with numerous other providers of satellite and terrestrial communications systems, products and equipment, including: Airbus, ASC Signal, Comtech, General Dynamics, Gilat, EchoStar (Hughes Network Systems), iDirect Technologies, L-3 Communications, Newtec, Panasonic, Space Systems/Loral (SS/L) (MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates), Thales and Zodiac Data Systems. In addition, some of our customers continuously evaluate whether to develop and manufacture their own products and could elect to compete with us at any time.
Within our government systems segment, we generally compete with government communications service providers and manufacturers of defense electronics products, systems or subsystems, such as BAE Systems, General Dynamics, Harris, Inmarsat, Intelsat, Rockwell Collins and similar companies. We may also compete directly with the largest defense prime contractors, including The Boeing Company (Boeing), Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon Systems. In many cases we partner with our competitors, and therefore maintaining an open and cooperative relationship is important.
Many of our competitors in our commercial networks and government systems segments have significant competitive advantages, including strong customer relationships, more experience with regulatory compliance, greater financial and management resources and access to technologies not available to us. Many of our competitors are also substantially larger than we are and may have more extensive engineering, manufacturing and marketing capabilities than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to changing technology or market conditions or may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products.
Publicly Traded Peers of Viasat Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | 9,824.72 | 4,625.77 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615.00 | 16,964.00 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,732.91 | 77,014.00 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,602.95 | 53,808.00 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,025.92 | 42,892.00 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390.27 | 36,130.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 602,359.37 | 303,592.61 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Viasat Inc .
Sources: Viasat Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Viasat Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Viasat Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kratos Defense and Security Solutions inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Globalstar Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kvh Industries Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gogo Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Echostar Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| L-3 Communications | Named by the company | 85% |
| Raytheon Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Panasonic Avionics Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| BAE Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Space Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hughes Network Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Boeing Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zodiac Data Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Viasat Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Viasat Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | Communication Services 71.11 % |
| Corning Inc | Optical Communications 40.55 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Aeronautics 40.43 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Marine Systems 32.36 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Aeronautics Systems 32.36 % |
| Echostar Corporation | Pay Tv 62.56 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Viasat Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | 9,825 | 616,769 | 1,181 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615 | 252,440 | 30,863 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 119,733 | 626,130 | 51,114 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,603 | 459,897 | 37,103 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,026 | 5,718,933 | 599,467 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390 | 357,723 | 81,356 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 592,535 | 541,466 | 18,201 |
Viasat Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | US 68.12 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | United States 70.72 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | United States 85.81 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | United States 91.54 % |
| Textron Inc | United States 70.21 % |
| Kratos Defense and Security Solutions inc | United States 78.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Viasat Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Viasat Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Viasat Inc ranks #9 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.49 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,781, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qualcomm Inc | 202,771 | 30.94 % |
| 2 | Sony Group Corporation | 143,483 | 21.90 % |
| 3 | Motorola Solutions inc | 76,160 | 11.62 % |
| 4 | Nokia Corporation | 62,309 | 9.51 % |
| 5 | Ciena Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Ubiquiti Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Ericsson Lm Telephone Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Fabrinet | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Viasat Inc | 9,757 | 1.49 % |
| 10 | Planet Labs Pbc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Viasat Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Viasat Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Nokia Corporation | 62,309 | 116.03 % |
| 5 | Ciena Corp | 50,551 | 151.88 % |
| 6 | Ubiquiti Inc | 33,840 | -13.24 % |
| 7 | Ericsson Lm Telephone Co | 31,664 | 16.85 % |
| 8 | Fabrinet | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Viasat Inc | 9,757 | 147.07 % |
| 10 | Planet Labs Pbc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Ondas Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Knowles Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Imax Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Sonos Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Viasat Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Viasat Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Consumer Electronics industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (65 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.00 % | 34.70 % (avg) | +8.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 2.35 % | industry median | +3.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 33.33 % | -0.86 % (avg) | +34.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.35 % (avg) | -4.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Viasat Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Consumer Electronics industry average (65 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 45.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.3x | 19.2x | -9.8x |
| P/B | 2.1x | 4.8x | -2.7x |
| Return on Equity | 0.19 % | industry aggregate | -29.35 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.54 % | 3.80 % (avg) | -3.26 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Viasat Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 24.14 % | 16.61 % | -1.00 % | 19.08 % | 0.24 % | 37.78 % | 22.11 % | 2.07 % |
| Operating Margin | -5.28 % | 1.48 % | 1.92 % | 2.17 % | -2.90 % | -26.70 % | 1.25 % | -0.98 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.13 % | 0.59 % | 0.65 % | 0.75 % | -0.92 % | -5.32 % | 0.28 % | -0.23 % |
| P/E | - | 49,245.7x | - | 169.5x | - | 3.2x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Viasat Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Viasat Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Viasat Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Viasat Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Viasat Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Viasat Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.05x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -0.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Viasat Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,781 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.35 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Viasat Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Viasat Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Viasat Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Viasat Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Viasat Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 29.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.05x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Viasat Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | 1.05 | 1.93 | 1.32 |
| Corning Inc | 0.25 | 1.64 | 0.68 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0.14 | 1.14 | 2.92 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 0.14 | 1.40 | 0.33 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.20 | 1.13 | 0.89 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0.51 | 1.31 | 2.10 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Viasat Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.2 % | - |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.6 % | +21.8 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +436.8 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +10.3 % | +13.2 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | -6.8 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | -6.1 % | +262.4 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +5.3 % | +45.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Viasat Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | Q2 2026 | +218.7 % | - |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.5 % | +37.0 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -9.4 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +13.1 % | +43.0 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +34.2 % | +30.7 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +39.4 % |
Viasat Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.19% |
| Corning Inc | 6.63% | 8.04% | 16.66% |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 10.40% | 14.74% | 86.24% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 7.52% | 13.52% | 17.41% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 8.93% | 11.14% | 26.58% |
| Honeywell International Inc | 10.74% | 17.01% | 49.57% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Viasat Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc | - | 2.12 |
| Corning Inc | 69.21 | 7.82 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 19.13 | 1.55 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 20.99 | 1.70 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 16.10 | 1.68 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 8.31 | 1.87 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 59.89 | 1.98 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.