Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Schmitt Industries Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Schmitt Industries Inc (SMIT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2022
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-50.23 %
Q1 2022
Net Margin
-233.95 %
Q1 2022

Key Findings: Schmitt Industries Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 10M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-46.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Schmitt Industries Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SMIT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022

Schmitt Industries Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMIT/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMIT/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMIT/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the IT Infrastructure industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs -50.2% for Schmitt Industries Inc. Schmitt Industries Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Schmitt Industries Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Schmitt Industries Inc No Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 0% 100% 0% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2022

100%market share
  • Schmitt Industries Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Schmitt Industries Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Schmitt Industries Inc's full market share breakdown »

SMIT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SMIT Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Schmitt Industries Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Schmitt Industries Inc -30.90 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Schmitt Industries Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SMIT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SMIT High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

SMIT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SMIT Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Schmitt Industries Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Competitors in the Balancer Segment primarily come from Germany and Italy. These competitors produce electromechanical and water balancers and process control products similar to SBS. The Company’s primary competitors are Marposs S.p.A., MPM Micro Prazision Marx GmbH and Balance Systems S.r.l.

Management believes the TMS and Lasercheck surface measurement products are two of only a few systems that provide fast, accurate, repeatable non-contact microroughness measurement for a wide variety of commercial customers. The Company believes its surface measurement products are currently the only systems that can provide measurements as low as a few hundredths of an Å, with reproducibility +/- 0.2Å or 1% and repeatability of +/-0.1Å. There are differences between our surface measurement products and other optical techniques (which include profilometers, scanning tunneling microscopes, atomic force microscopes or interferometers). These other technologies require the intervention of a skilled operator to perform measurements relatively slowly, whereas our surface measurement products are much simpler and, consequently, can make measurements more rapidly while still maintaining excellent repeatability and accuracy. Stylus profilometers are simpler devices that require less skilled operators. However, measurements must be conducted under vibration isolation conditions, and large areas require numerous scans; thus, stylus profilometers are generally destructive to soft materials such as most coated optics.


The market for distance measurement and dimensional sizing products is extremely competitive, characterized by rapidly changing technology. The Company believes the principal elements of competition include quality of ongoing technical support and maintenance coupled with responsiveness to customer needs, as well as price, product quality, reliability and performance. The differences between the Company’s sensors and competitive products include pushbutton selection of output signals in certain models and sensors that can be programmed using serial commands through a PC computer.


Competing surface measurement products and dimensional sizing products come from established multinational competitors, most of which are significantly larger and have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources. Company pricing is intended to obtain market share and meet competitive supplier prices. The market strategy is to establish measurement products with the best quality, reliability and performance and superior economic value.

Management believes that the Xact Tank Monitoring System offers the only ultrasonic sensor specifically designed to provide independent precise tank level calculation while most other competitors utilize gauge-reading technology, which reads the tank fill level from a pre-installed float gauge and is less accurate. Competitors offer telemetry options based on cellular or closed loop communication networks whereas Xact telemetry is satellite based. Competitors include, but are not limited to, Independent Technologies, Inc. (Wesroc), NasCorp (SkyTracker), WacnGo, Silicon Controls, TankLink, Centeron, TankScan and Enertrack.

 

Schmitt Industries Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
NasCorp (SkyTracker) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
TankScan Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Anova (Wesroc) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SkyBitz Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Soluna Holdings Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Otodata Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
WACnGO Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Micro-Design, Inc. (LevelCon) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Tank Utility Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Angus Energy (Gremlin) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Silicon Controls Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Schmitt Industries Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Schmitt Industries Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Schmitt Industries Inc Ice Cream 84.05 % Measurement 15.95 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License