Rpm International Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rpm International Inc (RPM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Rpm International Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 7,863M vs 314,923M combined for tracked competitors (2.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+11.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Rpm International Inc generated 7.2% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2026, vs 9.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.9% net margin compares with 17.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Rpm International Inc ranks #7 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Chemical Manufacturing industry, holding 2.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Rpm International Inc accounted for 2.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 2.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.45M compares with $0.59M for the peer group (0.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RPM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Rpm International Inc reported revenue growth of 7.20 % year on year in Q4 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.20 %.
With a net margin of 9.91 %, Rpm International Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.91 %).
Rpm International Inc generated 2.49 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 2.53 % a year earlier.
Rpm International Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Rpm International Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Rpm International Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Chemical Manufacturing industry grew revenue 2.6% year over year, combined, vs 7.2% for Rpm International Inc. Rpm International Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.28% to 2.38%, a gain of 0.10 percentage points.
Rpm International Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (50) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RPM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RPM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
RPM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Materion Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Ecopetrol S a | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Koppers Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Valaris Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rpm International Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Rpm International Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We conduct our business in highly competitive markets, and all of our major
products face competition from local, regional, national and multi-national
firms. Our markets, however, are fragmented, and we do not face competition
across all of our products from any one competitor in particular. Several of
our competitors have access to greater financial resources and larger sales
organizations than we do. While third-party figures are not necessarily available
with respect to the size of our position in the market for each of our products,
we believe that we are a major producer of caulks, sealants, patch-and-repair
products for the general consumer as well as for the residential building trade;
roofing systems; urethane sealants and waterproofing materials; aluminum coatings;
cement-based coatings; hobby paints; small project paints; industrial-corrosion-control
products; fireproofing; consumer rust-preventative coatings; polymer floorings;
fluorescent coatings and pigments; fiberglass-reinforced-plastic gratings; nail
polish; water and fire damage restoration products; carpet cleaning systems
and shellac-based coatings. However, we do not believe that we have a significant
share of the total protective coatings market (on a world-wide basis). The following
is a summary of the competition that our key products face in the various markets
in which we compete:
Paints, Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants Products
The market for paints, coatings, adhesives and sealants has experienced significant
consolidation over the past several decades. However, the market remains fragmented,
which creates further consolidation opportunities for industry participants.
Many leading suppliers tend to focus on coatings, while other companies focus
on adhesives and sealants. Barriers to market entry are relatively high for
new market entrants due to the lengthy intervals between product development
and market acceptance, the importance of brand identity and the difficulty in
establishing a reputation as a reliable supplier of these products. Most of
the suppliers, including us, who provide these items have a portfolio of products
that span across a wide variety of applications.
Consumer Home Improvement Products. Within the consumer segment, we generally
serve the home improvement market with products designed for niche architectural,
rust-preventative, decorative and special purpose paint and caulking and sealing
applications. The products we sell for home improvement include those sold under
our DAP, Phenoseal, Rust-Oleum, Watco and Zinsser brand names. Leading manufacturers
of home improvement-related coatings, adhesives and sealants market their products
to DIY users and contractors through a wide range of distribution channels.
These distribution channels include direct sales to home improvement centers,
mass merchandisers, hardware and paint stores, and sales through distributors
and sales representative organizations. Competitors in this market generally
compete for market share by marketing and building upon brand recognition, providing
customer service and developing new products based on customer needs.
Industrial Protective Coatings Products. Anti-corrosion protective coatings
and fireproofing must withstand the destructive elements of nature and operating
processes under harsh environments and conditions. Some of the larger consumers
of high-performance protective and corrosion control coatings and fireproofing
are the oil and gas, pulp and paper, petrochemical, shipbuilding, public utility
and bridge and highway industries. In the public sector, corrosion control coatings
are used on structures such as bridges and in water and wastewater treatment
plants. These markets are highly fragmented. We and our competitors compete
for market share by supplying a wide variety of high-quality products and by
offering customized solutions. Our protective industrial coating products are
marketed primarily under our Carboline, Plasite, Nullifire, A/D Fire, Thermo-lag,
Perlifoc and Epoplex brand names.
Roofing Systems Products
In the roofing industry, re-roofing applications have historically accounted
for three-quarters of U.S. demand, with the remaining quarter generated by new
roofing applications. The largest manufacturers of roofing systems products
focus primarily on residential roofing as well as single-ply systems for low-end,
commercial and institutional applications, competing mainly on price and, to
a lesser degree, service. In contrast, we compete primarily for the higher-end,
multi-ply and modified bitumen applications in the built-up and low-slope roofing
industry. This specialty niche within the larger market tends to exhibit fewer
commodity-market characteristics, with customers valuing the greater protection
and longer life provided by these roofing systems, as well as ongoing maintenance,
inspection and technical services. Our roofing systems are primarily marketed
under our Tremco and Viapol brands. Historically, our typical roofing systems
customers have included governmental facilities, universities, schools, hospitals,
museums and certain manufacturing facilities. However, we are also very active
in the growing market of sustainable roofing systems, and our Tremco Roofing
fluid applied and restoration coating systems represent our fastest growing
product segment. Our restoration systems meet sustainable objectives including
energy efficiency through reflectivity and emissivity, and eliminate environmentally
and economically costly landfill waste.
Construction Chemical Products
Flooring Systems Products. Polymer flooring systems are used in industrial,
commercial and, to a lesser extent, residential applications to provide a smooth,
seamless surface that is impervious to penetration by water and other substances
while being easy to clean and maintain. These systems are particularly well-suited
for clean environments such as pharmaceutical, food and beverage and healthcare
facilities. In addition, the fast installation time and long-term durability
of these systems and products make them ideal for industrial floor repair and
restoration. Polymer flooring systems are based on epoxy, polyurethane and methylmethacrylate
resins. Most of these flooring systems are applied during new construction,
but there is also a significant repair and renovation market. Key performance
attributes in polymer flooring systems that distinguish competitors for these
applications include static control, chemical resistance, contamination control,
durability and aesthetics. We market our flooring systems under the Stonhard,
Flowcrete, Expanko, Fritztile, Hummervoll and API brand names.
FRP Grating and Structural Composites. Fiberglass reinforced plastic grating,
or FRP, is used primarily in industrial and, to a lesser extent, commercial
applications. FRP grating exhibits many specialized features, which make it
a beneficial alternative to traditional steel or aluminum grating. These include
a high strength-to-weight ratio, high corrosion resistance, electrical and thermal
non-conductivity, and molded-in color, which eliminates the need for repainting.
FRP grating is used for platforms, walkways, stairs and structures for a variety
of applications, including those in the food and beverage, chemical processing,
water-wastewater, pulp and paper, and offshore oil and gas industries. Other
structural composites include trench drains, channel drains, curbing and structural
members. Key attributes that differentiate competitors in these markets include
product quality, depth of product line, and design-and-fabrication services.
Our products for these applications are sold under our Fibergrate, Chemgrate,
Corgrate, Safe-T-Span, EnviroKerb, EnviroChannel, EnviroDeck and EnviroGrate
brand names.
Publicly Traded Peers of Rpm International Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | 12,780.91 | 7,863.42 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| 3m Company | 88,536.35 | 25,180.00 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 81,866.34 | 24,409.20 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,080.91 | 16,995.90 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 78,589.21 | 16,469.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,035,341.76 | 422,605.43 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Rpm International Inc .
Sources: Rpm International Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Rpm International Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Rpm International Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Victory Clean Energy Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gcp Applied Technologies Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ppg Industries Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Construction Chemical Products Flooring Systems Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Industrial Protective Coatings Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sealants Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Roofing Systems Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Consumer Home Improvement Products | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Rpm International Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Rpm International Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | Consumer Segment 35.10 % |
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| 3m Company | Safety and Industrial 47.55 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Paint Stores Group 57.30 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 50.05 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Automotive OEM 20.42 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Rpm International Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | 12,781 | 448,160 | 37,738 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| 3m Company | 88,536 | 416,198 | 49,785 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 81,866 | 379,916 | 41,840 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,081 | 354,081 | 44,450 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 78,589 | 383,000 | 74,279 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,022,561 | 593,771 | 54,591 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Rpm International Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | US 68.55 % |
| 3m Company | Americas 54.09 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Non-US 20.00 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Ppg Industries Inc | North America 35.64 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | United States 44.47 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Rpm International Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 79 companies in Rpm International Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Rpm International Inc ranks #7 of 79 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.39 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,024, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 217,945 | 41.32 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 62,697 | 11.89 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 52,519 | 9.96 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 23,742 | 4.50 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 12,625 | 2.39 % |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Rpm International Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Rpm International Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 62,697 | 5.88 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 52,519 | 16.89 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 23,742 | 1.81 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 21,741 | 40.29 % |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 12,625 | -14.78 % |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Axalta Coating Systems Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Sensient Technologies Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Rpm International Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Rpm International Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemical Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (96 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.35 % | 30.74 % (avg) | -1.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.46 % | 3.22 % (avg) | +13.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 7.98 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Rpm International Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Chemical Manufacturing industry average (96 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 20.2x | 27.8x | -7.5x |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.5x | 16.1x | -3.6x |
| P/B | 4.3x | 3.9x | +0.4x |
| Return on Equity | 21.35 % | industry aggregate | 18.55 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 0.90 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Rpm International Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 5.93 % | 2.42 % | 1.95 % | 10.10 % | 13.30 % | 1.76 % | 0.21 % | 3.14 % |
| Operating Margin | 7.40 % | 9.26 % | 11.49 % | 10.55 % | 10.77 % | 11.05 % | 11.29 % | 14.21 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.00 % | 9.39 % | 10.95 % | 10.11 % | 11.22 % | 10.67 % | 10.97 % | 12.27 % |
| P/E | 33.5x | 29.8x | 26.8x | 26.7x | 23.5x | 26.9x | 26.1x | 20.9x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Rpm International Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Rpm International Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Rpm International Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.06x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Linde Plc alone holds 41% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Rpm International Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,024 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Rpm International Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Rpm International Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Rpm International Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Rpm International Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Rpm International Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 18.6 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.06x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Linde Plc, holding 41.32 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Rpm International Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | 0.19 | 2.05 | 1.04 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| 3m Company | - | 1.57 | 3.20 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 0.03 | 0.81 | 2.67 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.38 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 0.17 | 1.24 | 2.93 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rpm International Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | -2.1 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +2.5 % | +29.4 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | +11.8 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | +1.9 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | +7.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +2.6 % | +60.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rpm International Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | -10.1 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +4.7 % | +7.2 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Q2 2026 | +8.0 % | -40.3 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | +10.8 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Q2 2026 | -10.5 % | -8.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
Rpm International Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | 8.29% | 9.64% | 21.35% |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| 3m Company | 8.27% | 11.16% | 76.55% |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 10.20% | 16.38% | 62.12% |
| Ecolab Inc | 8.24% | 9.11% | 21.51% |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 19.64% | 26.49% | 101.72% |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Rpm International Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Rpm International Inc | 19.42 | 1.63 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| 3m Company | 30.10 | 3.52 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 30.73 | 3.35 |
| Ecolab Inc | 37.59 | 4.65 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 36.46 | 4.77 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 26.69 | 2.45 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rpm International Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
