Ranger Oil's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ranger Oil (ROCC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ranger Oil vs Its Competitors
- Growth: Ranger Oil generated 19.5% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs 14.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 40.7% net margin compares with 22.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Ranger Oil accounted for 58.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 57.6% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ROCC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Ranger Oil reported revenue growth of 19.53 % year on year in Q1 2022, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 14.56 %.
With a net margin of 40.70 %, Ranger Oil achieved higher profitability than its competitors (22.90 %).
Ranger Oil generated 58.66 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 57.62 % a year earlier.
Ranger Oil vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ranger Oil and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ranger Oil's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.3% year over year, combined, vs 19.5% for Ranger Oil. Ranger Oil's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Ranger Oil's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ROCC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W and t Offshore inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ranger Oil's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ranger Oil Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | 774.64 | - |
| W and t Offshore inc | 564.41 | 573.64 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,339.05 | 573.64 |
Sources: Ranger Oil Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ranger Oil Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ranger Oil's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | 775 | - | - |
| W and t Offshore inc | 564 | 1,550,378 | -293,432 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 564 | 1,550,378 | -293,432 |
Ranger Oil's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (165 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 92.13 % | 57.30 % (avg) | +34.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -133.04 % | industry median | -101.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -127.38 % | 11.81 % (avg) | -139.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 52.25 % | 24.95 % (avg) | +27.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ranger Oil's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2013 | 2015 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 36.05 % | -53.15 % | 6.89 % |
| Operating Margin | -21.33 % | -512.63 % | 37.52 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -4.90 % | -308.62 % | 18.31 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ranger Oil's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 52.25 % vs industry average 24.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ranger Oil's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ranger Oil's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ranger Oil's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ranger Oil falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ranger Oil's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 101.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 99.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ranger Oil's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.67 |
| W and t Offshore inc | 0.60 | 1.07 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ranger Oil's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | Q4 2022 | - | - |
| W and t Offshore inc | Q2 2026 | +42.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | - | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ranger Oil's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | Q4 2022 | +506.7 % | -92.9 % |
| W and t Offshore inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Ranger Oil's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | - | - | - |
| W and t Offshore inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ranger Oil's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Oil Corporation | - | - |
| W and t Offshore inc | - | 0.98 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 2.33 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.