Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Public Policy Holding Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Public Policy Holding Inc (PPHC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
27.50 %
Q1 2026
Net Margin
-22.94 %
Q1 2026

Key Findings: Public Policy Holding Inc vs Its Competitors

  • Scale: Public Policy Holding Inc ranks #13 of 40 companies by market capitalization in the Consulting Services industry, holding 0.6% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Public Policy Holding Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PPHC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026

Public Policy Holding Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PPHC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PPHC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PPHC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Consulting Services industry grew revenue 7.1% year over year, combined, vs 27.5% for Public Policy Holding Inc. Public Policy Holding Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.20% to 0.24%, a gain of 0.04 percentage points.

Public Policy Holding Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Public Policy Holding Company Inc - - - Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 75% 25% 25% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2026

100%market share
  • Public Policy Holding Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Public Policy Holding Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Public Policy Holding Inc's full market share breakdown »

PPHC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PPHC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Public Policy Holding Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
11.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 9)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Public Policy Holding Company Inc - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Public Policy Holding Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PPHC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

PPHC High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

PPHC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

PPHC Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Public Policy Holding Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company’s Government Relations Consulting segment competes with large top 25 lobbying firms at the US federal level, including those within major law firms and specialist lobbying firms. Competition also comes from smaller lobbying firms, individual practitioners, and in-house government relations staff. At the state level, competitors vary by state. Multi-state lobbying firms include Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Cornerstone Government Affairs. In California, competitors include California Strategies and Axiom Advisors, while in Texas, competitors include Hillco Partners and McGuire Woods. In the Corporate Communications and Public Affairs Consulting segment, key US competitors include public relations firms across various sub-sectors such as public affairs, general PR services, and media relations. These competitors include large diversified firms such as Edelman, Burson, and FGS, as well as smaller firms.

Public Policy Holding Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Cornerstone Government Affairs Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Edelman Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Burson Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
McGuire Woods Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Axiom Advisors Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
FGS Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
California Strategies Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Axiom Advisors Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hillco Partners Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Public Policy Holding Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.