Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Douglas Dynamics Inc (PLOW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
10.47 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
11.59 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Douglas Dynamics Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 700M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+22.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Douglas Dynamics Inc ranks #8 of 20 companies by market capitalization in the Construction & Mining Machinery industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Douglas Dynamics Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PLOW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Douglas Dynamics Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLOW/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLOW/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PLOW/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Construction & Mining Machinery industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs 10.5% for Douglas Dynamics Inc. Douglas Dynamics Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.36% to 0.37%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Douglas Dynamics Inc Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 80% 78% 56% 44%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 42.90 % (3 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Douglas Dynamics Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Douglas Dynamics Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Douglas Dynamics Inc's full market share breakdown »

PLOW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PLOW Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(5 of 10)
28.6%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Douglas Dynamics Inc 26.70 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Douglas Dynamics Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PLOW Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

PLOW High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

PLOW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

PLOW Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

PLOW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

PLOW Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

We compete solely with other North American manufacturers who do not benefit from our extensive distributor network, manufacturing efficiencies and depth and breadth of products. As the market leader in snow and ice control equipment for light trucks and following the Henderson acquisition, heavy duty trucks, we enjoy a set of competitive advantages versus smaller equipment providers, which allows us to generate robust cash flows in all snowfall environments and to support continued investment in our products, distribution capabilities and brand regardless of annual volume fluctuations. We believe these advantages are rooted in the following competitive strengths and reinforces our industry leadership over time.

Exceptional Customer Loyalty and Brand Equity. Our brands enjoy exceptional customer loyalty and brand equity in the snow and ice control equipment industry with both end-users and distributors, which have been developed through over 50 years of superior innovation, productivity, reliability and support, consistently delivered season after season. We believe past brand experience, rather than price, is the key factor impacting snowplow purchasing decisions.

Broadest and Most Innovative Product Offering. We provide the industry’s broadest product offering with a full range of snowplows, sand and salt spreaders and related parts and accessories. We believe we maintain the industry’s largest and most advanced in-house new product development program, historically introducing several new and redesigned products each year. Our broad product offering and commitment to new product development is essential to maintaining and growing our leading market share position as well as continuing to increase the profitability of our business.

Extensive North American Distributor Network. With over 2,200 points of sale, we benefit from having the most extensive distributor network in the industry, providing a significant competitive advantage over our peers. Our distributors function not only as sales and support agents (providing access to parts and service), but also as industry partners providing real-time end-user information, such as retail inventory levels, changing consumer preferences or desired functionality enhancements, which we use as the basis for our product development efforts.

Leader in Operational Efficiency. We believe we are a leader in operational efficiency in our industry, resulting from our application of lean manufacturing principles and a highly variable cost structure. By utilizing lean principles, we are able to adjust production levels easily to meet fluctuating demand, while controlling costs in slower periods. This operational efficiency is supplemented by our highly variable cost structure, driven in part by our access to a sizable temporary workforce (comprising approximately 10-15% of our total workforce during average snowfall years), which we can quickly adjust, as needed. These manufacturing efficiencies enable us to respond rapidly to urgent customer demand during times of sudden and unpredictable snowfalls, allowing us to provide exceptional service to our existing customer base and capture new customers from competitors that we believe cannot service their customers’ needs with the same speed and reliability.

Strong Cash Flow Generation. We are able to generate significant cash flow as a result of relatively consistent high profitability, low capital spending requirements and predictable timing of our working capital requirements. Our cash flow results will also benefit substantially from approximately $19.0 million of annual tax-deductible intangible and goodwill expense over the next four years, which has the impact of reducing our corporate taxes owed by approximately $7.3 million on an annual basis during this period, in the event we have sufficient taxable income to utilize such benefit. Our significant cash flow has allowed us to reinvest in our business, pay down long term debt, and pay substantial dividends on a pro rata basis to our stockholders.

Experienced Management Team. We believe our business benefits from an exceptional management team that is responsible for establishing our leadership in the snow and ice control equipment industry for light trucks.


Our senior management team, consisting of four officers, has an average of approximately 24 years of weather-related industry experience and an average of over fourteen years with our company. James Janik, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, has been with us for over 22 years and in his role as President and Chief Executive Officer since 2000, and through his strategic vision, we have been able to expand our distributor network and grow our market leading position.

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Aebi Schmidt Holding Ag Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Douglas Dynamics Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Douglas Dynamics Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Douglas Dynamics Inc Work Truck Solutions 55.81 % Work Truck Attachments 44.21 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License