Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Plains Gp Holdings Lp (PAGP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors
5
Named by the company
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
66.26 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
10.26 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Plains Gp Holdings Lp vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 52,306M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+35.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Plains Gp Holdings Lp ranks #26 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.5% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Plains Gp Holdings Lp accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
  • Structure: Plains Gp Holdings Lp operates in the following segments: Natural Gas Liquids; and reports the following subsidiaries: Plains All American Pipeline Lp (competes with Crossamerica Partners Lp, Global Partners Lp, South Bow Corporation).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

PAGP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Plains Gp Holdings Lp generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PAGP/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PAGP/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/PAGP/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.
Explore the Financial Data API

For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 43.4% year over year, combined, vs 66.3% for Plains Gp Holdings Lp. Plains Gp Holdings Lp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 5.13% to 5.94%, a gain of 0.82 percentage points.

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Plains Gp Holdings Lp Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 0% 0% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 100% 88% 75% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Plains Gp Holdings Lp100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Plains Gp Holdings Lp and its 5 competitors.

See Plains Gp Holdings Lp's full market share breakdown »

PAGP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

PAGP Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
66.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(6 of 9)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Plains Gp Holdings Lp 50.50 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Plains Gp Holdings Lp's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

PAGP Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

PAGP High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

PAGP Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

PAGP Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 9) Percent change over the selected range

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company competes with other crude oil and NGL pipeline and terminalling companies, NGL processing and fractionation companies, major integrated oil companies and their marketing affiliates, independent gatherers, private equity-backed entities, banks with trading platforms, and brokers and marketers of various sizes and resources. Some competitors possess greater capital resources. The development of new pipelines with minimum volume commitments or acreage dedications may increase competition for purchasing wellhead barrels, particularly in the Permian Basin, which could affect margins.

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from Plains Gp Holdings Lp reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
South Bow Corporation Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Pembina Pipeline Corporation Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Martin Midstream Partners L p Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Crossamerica Partners Lp Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Global Partners Lp Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Plains Gp Holdings Lp's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.

Plains Gp Holdings Lp's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Plains Gp Holdings Lp Natural Gas Liquids 0.12 % - -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API Connect Your AI