Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Northwest Natural Holding's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Northwest Natural Holding (NWN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
3.12 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
0.74 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Northwest Natural Holding vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,293M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-24.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Northwest Natural Holding ranks #36 of 49 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Northwest Natural Holding accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

NWN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Northwest Natural Holding generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NWN/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NWN/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NWN/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 24.5% year over year, combined, vs 3.1% for Northwest Natural Holding. Northwest Natural Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.10% to 0.08%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.

Northwest Natural Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Northwest Natural Holding Company Yes Yes No -
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 75% 78% 67% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Northwest Natural Holding100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Northwest Natural Holding and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Northwest Natural Holding's full market share breakdown »

NWN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

NWN Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Northwest Natural Holding's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(5 of 10)
16.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Northwest Natural Holding Company 7.90 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Northwest Natural Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

NWN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

NWN Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

NWN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

NWN Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Northwest Natural Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

NWN Gas Utility operates without direct competition from other natural gas distributors within its service areas but competes with alternative energy sources such as electricity, fuel oil, and propane for residential and small to mid-size commercial customers. In industrial and large commercial markets, NWN Gas Utility faces competition from all energy forms, including wholesale natural gas marketers. SiEnergy competes based on customer preference for natural gas versus other energy alternatives, pricing, and competition from other natural gas utilities. In Texas, the absence of defined service territories results in increased competition among multiple gas utilities targeting developers, builders, and end-use customers. Key competitive factors include price, efficiency, reliability, performance, customer preference, market conditions, technology, and energy policies.

Northwest Natural Holding's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
NW Natural Renewables Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
EDL Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SiEnergy Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NW Natural Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Northwest Natural Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.