Mts Systems's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mts Systems (MTSC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Mts Systems vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 822M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Mts Systems accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
- Structure: Mts Systems operates in the following segments: Test & Simulation, Sensors.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MTSC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2020
Mts Systems generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
For context: the Scientific & Technical Instruments industry grew revenue 14.1% year over year, combined, vs -3.4% for Mts Systems. Mts Systems's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.92% to 0.78%, a loss of 0.14 percentage points.
Mts Systems's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mts Systems Corporation | No | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MTSC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MTSC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MTSC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Mts Systems's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
For relatively simple and inexpensive mechanical testing applications, customers may satisfy their needs internally by building their own test systems or using competitors who compete on price, performance, quality and service. For larger and more complex mechanical test systems, we compete directly with several companies throughout the world based upon customer value including application knowledge, engineering capabilities, technical features, price, quality and service.
Sensors Segment
We primarily compete on factors that include technical performance, price and service in new applications or in situations in which other position sensing technologies have been used. Sensors’ competitors are typically either larger companies that carry multiple sensor product lines or smaller, privately held companies throughout the world.
Mts Systems's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Mts Systems reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Esab Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| The Middleby Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Hillman Solutions Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Lincoln Electric | Company report | 85% |
| Sysco Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Tradeweb Markets Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Scientific Industries Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Oshkosh Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Enovis Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Dover Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Stanley Black and Decker Inc | Company report | 85% |
| 3m Company | Company report | 85% |
| Danaher Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Nn Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Axalta Coating Systems Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Regal Rexnord Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Itt Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Avery Dennison Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Rpm International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Enpro Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Honeywell International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Gcp Applied Technologies Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Snap on Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sealed Air Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Emerson Electric Co | Company report | 85% |
| Ppg Industries Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mts Systems's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Mts Systems's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Mts Systems Corporation | Test & Simulation 56.95 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).