Kalera Public Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Kalera Public Limited (KAL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Kalera Public Limited vs Its Competitors
- Peer revenue share: Kalera Public Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
KAL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2022
Kalera Public Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 109.0% for Kalera Public Limited. Kalera Public Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Kalera Public Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalera Public Limited Company | - | - | - | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
KAL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
KAL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Kalera Public Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Kalera Public Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.