CSIMarket
 

Icahn Enterprises l p   (NASDAQ: IEP)

Icahn Enterprises L P 's

Competitiveness




 

IEP Sales vs. its Competitors Q1 2026



Comparing the current results to its competitors, Icahn Enterprises L P reported Revenue increase in the 1 quarter 2026 by 18.16 % year on year.
The sales growth was above Icahn Enterprises L P 's competitors' average revenue growth of 5.4 %, achieved in the same quarter.

List of IEP Competitors





Revenue Growth Comparisons




Net Income Comparison


Icahn Enterprises l p , despite income growth by most of its competitors recorded a net loss, despite income increase by most of its competitors of 8.86 %

<<  IEP Stock Performance Comparisons


Icahn Enterprises L P 's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers


The global vehicular parts business is highly competitive. Federal-Mogul competes with many independent manufacturers and distributors of component parts globally. In general, competition for sales is based on price, product quality, technology, delivery, customer service and the breadth of products offered by a given supplier. Federal-Mogul is meeting these competitive challenges by developing leading technologies, efficiently integrating and expanding its manufacturing and distribution operations, widening its product coverage within its core businesses, restructuring its operations and transferring production to best cost countries, and utilizing its worldwide technical centers to develop and provide value-added solutions to its customers. A summary of Federal-Moguls primary independent competitors by its businesses is set forth below.

Powertrain. Primary competitors include AGM Automotive, Art Metal, Bergmann, BinZou, Bleistahl, Bosch, Daido, Dana, Dana-Reinz, Delfingen, Denso, DongYang, ElringKlinger, FNOK, Freudenberg, Kaco/Sabo, Kolbenschmidt, Mahle, Miba, NGK, NOK, NPR, Relats, Sinteron, SKF, Taiho, and Vitrica.

Motorparts. Primary competitors include Akebono Brake Corporation, Autolite, Brake Parts Inc., Bosch Group, Centric Parts, Crowne Group LLC, Delphi Automotive LLP, Denso Corporation, Dorman Products, Inc., GRI Engineering and Development LLC (MAT Holdings, Inc.), Mahle GmbH, Mevotech Inc., NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd., NTN Bearing Corporation, Neapco Inc., Old World Industries, LLC, Phillips Industries, Pylon Manufacturing Corporation, Rain-X (ITW Global Brands), SKF Group, Osram Sylvania Ltd., The Timken Company, Valeo Group, Dana Corporation (Victor Reinz brand), and ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.

IEH Auto and Pep Boys operate in a highly competitive environment. IEH Auto and Pep Boys encounter competition from national and regional chains, automotive dealerships and from local independent service providers and merchants.

The petroleum business competes primarily on the basis of price, reliability of supply, availability of multiple grades of products and location. The principal competitive factors affecting its refining operations are cost of crude oil and other feedstock costs, refinery complexity, refinery efficiency, refinery product mix and product distribution and transportation costs. The location of the refineries provides the petroleum business with a reliable supply of crude oil and a transportation cost advantage over its competitors. The petroleum business primarily competes against five refineries operated in the mid-continent region. In addition to these refineries, the refineries compete against trading companies, as well as other refineries located outside the region that are linked to the mid-continent market through an extensive product pipeline system. These competitors include refineries located near the Gulf Coast and the Texas panhandle region. The petroleum business refinery competition also includes branded, integrated and independent oil refining companies, such as Phillips 66 Company, HollyFrontier Corporation, CHS Inc., Valero Energy Corporation and Flint Hills Resources LLC.

The nitrogen fertilizer business has experienced and expect to continue to meet significant levels of competition from current and potential competitors, many of whom have significantly greater financial and other resources. Competition in the nitrogen fertilizer industry is dominated by price considerations. However, during the spring and fall application seasons, farming activities intensify and delivery capacity is a significant competitive factor. The nitrogen fertilizer business maintains a large fleet of leased and owned railcars and seasonally adjusts inventory to enhance its manufacturing and distribution operations.
The nitrogen fertilizer business major competitors include Agrium, Inc.; CF Industries Holdings, Inc., including its majority owned subsidiary Terra Nitrogen Company, LP.; Koch Nitrogen Company, LLC; and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. Domestic competition is intense due to customers sophisticated buying tendencies and competitor strategies that focus on cost and service. The nitrogen fertilizer business also encounters competition from producers of fertilizer products manufactured in foreign countries. In certain cases, foreign producers of fertilizer who export to the United States may be subsidized by their respective governments.

The North American railcar manufacturing industry has historically been extremely competitive. ARI competes primarily with Trinity Industries, Inc. ("Trinity"), The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., National Steel Car Limited, FreightCar America Inc. and Union Tank Car Company ("Union Tank"). Competitors have expanded and may continue to expand their capabilities in ARIs core railcar markets.
The railcar leasing industry has also historically been extremely competitive. Both ARI and ARL compete primarily with Wells Fargo Rail Corp., GATX Corp., CIT Group, Trinity and Union Tank in the railcar leasing market.

Our Gaming segment owns land-based and riverboat casino facilities in six states and one hotel, timeshare and casino resort located on the island of Aruba. Our Gaming segment competes with numerous casinos and casino hotels of varying quality and size in the markets in which its properties are located and with other forms of legalized gaming, including internet gaming, state-sponsored lotteries, racetracks, off-track wagering, video lottery, video poker terminals and card parlors. Our Gaming segment also competes with other non-gaming resorts and vacation areas, and with various other entertainment businesses. The casino entertainment business is characterized by competitors that vary considerably by their size, quality of facilities, number of operations, brand identities, marketing and growth strategies, financial strength and capabilities, level of amenities, management talent and geographic diversity.


In most markets, our Gaming segment competes directly with other casino facilities operating in the immediate and surrounding market areas, including casinos located on Native American reservations. In some markets, our Gaming segment faces competition from nearby markets in addition to direct competition within its market areas.
Our Gaming segment believes competition in existing markets has intensified over the last several years, due to new markets opening for development, new properties opening in existing markets, and challenging economic conditions in certain markets. Many casino operators have invested in expanding existing facilities, developing new facilities, and acquiring established facilities in existing markets. The expansion of casino entertainment at existing properties, the increase in the number of properties and the aggressive marketing strategies of many of our competitors has increased competition in many markets in which our Gaming segment competes, and it expects this intense competition to continue.


Our Gaming segments operating results can be adversely affected by costs associated with advertising, promotions and complimentary services to patrons, the amount and timing of which may be affected by the advertising and complimentary policies and actions of its properties competitors and its efforts to keep pace with them. If our Gaming segments operating revenues are insufficient to allow it to match the promotions of competitors, the number of its casino patrons may decline, which may have a material adverse effect on our Gaming segments financial performance. In addition, some of Gaming segments competitors have significantly greater financial resources than it does, and as a result our Gaming segment may not be able to successfully compete with them in the future.

The home fashion industry is fragmented and highly competitive. Future success will, to a large extent, depend on WPHs ability to be a competitive low-cost producer. WPH competes with both foreign and domestic companies on, among other factors, the basis of price, quality, design and customer service. WPH may also face competition in the future from companies that are currently third-party suppliers to WPH. Future success depends on the ability to remain competitive in the areas of marketing, product development, price, quality, brand names, manufacturing capabilities, distribution and order processing.





  

Overall company Market Share Q1 2026

Overall company sales advanced by 18.16 % Icahn Enterprises L P outperformed its competitors in this segment and improved market share, to approx. 0.67 %.
<<  More on IEP Market Share.
 
*Market share is calculated based on total revenue.





Publicly Traded Peers of Icahn Enterprises l p




Exxon Mobil Corporation
Share Performance



+5.67%
This Quarter



Exxon Mobil Corporation
Profile

Exxon Mobil Corporation operates as a multinational oil and gas company, involved in the full spectrum of the industry, including upstream exploration and production, midstream transportation, and downstream refining and marketing of petroleum products globally. The company focuses on optimizing its operations to enhance efficiency and sustainability across its diverse portfolio.

More about Exxon Mobil Corporation's Market Share

Market Cap. Revenues TTM Net Income TTM
$ 675,093.320 mill. $ 334,246.000 mill. $ 26,203.000 mill.


O Reilly Automotive Inc
Share Performance



-8.17%
30 Days



O Reilly Automotive Inc
Profile

OReilly Automotive Inc. operates as a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts, tools, supplies, equipment, and accessories, serving both professional service providers and do-it-yourself customers. The company utilizes a multi-channel business model, combining a widespread network of retail stores, an e-commerce platform, and a dedicated professional sales team to effectively meet diverse customer needs.

More about O Reilly Automotive Inc's Market Share

Market Cap. Revenues TTM Net Income TTM
$ 71,192.074 mill. $ 18,572.342 mill. $ 2,650.374 mill.


Oneok Inc
Share Performance



+9.62%
This Quarter



Oneok Inc
Profile

Oneok Inc operates as a midstream service provider in the energy sector, focusing on the gathering, processing, transportation, and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids. The company utilizes an integrated network of pipelines and processing facilities to ensure the efficient movement of energy resources from production sites to end-users. Oneok generates revenue by charging fees for its services, which are based on the volume of resources transported and processed within its infrastructure.

More about Oneok Inc 's Market Share

Market Cap. Revenues TTM Net Income TTM
$ 61,626.320 mill. $ 39,366.000 mill. $ 3,661.000 mill.


Enpro Inc
Share Performance



-9.01%
30 Days



Enpro Inc
Profile

Enpro Industries Inc operates through a diversified business model, focusing on engineering and manufacturing high-performance industrial products across various sectors.

More about Enpro Inc's Market Share

Market Cap. Revenues TTM Net Income TTM
$ 6,483.986 mill. $ 1,223.800 mill. $ 44.100 mill.


Murphy Oil Corporation
Share Performance



-5.98%
This Quarter



Murphy Oil Corporation
Profile

Murphy Oil Corporation's business model revolves around exploration, production, refining, and marketing of oil and gas products.

More about Murphy Oil Corporation's Market Share

Market Cap. Revenues TTM Net Income TTM
$ 5,492.261 mill. $ 3,019.401 mill. $ 346.468 mill.

36 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors

Sources: Icahn Enterprises l p’s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com’s market research; and the financial filings and press releases of other companies cited in this report.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies.
For your research, we’ve provided 10 tables on Icahn Enterprises l p versus competitors, including market share analysis.
You can find them in the navigation menu under Competition.
To download the tables, please subscribe.



Help

About us

Products

Data downloads

API

CSIMarket Company, Sector, Industry, Market Analysis, Stock Quotes, Earnings, Economy, News and Research.

Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. All quotes are in local exchange time. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and other exchanges. Fundamental and financial data for Stocks, Sector, Industry, and Economic Indicators provided by CSIMarket.com

Disclaimer: Information provided by CSIMarket.com is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

© 2026 CSIMarket.com — Proprietary financial dataset. All rights reserved. Redistribution or automated extraction prohibited.