Comparing the current results to its competitors, Icahn Enterprises L P reported Revenue increase in the 1 quarter 2026 by 18.16 % year on year. The sales growth was above Icahn Enterprises L P 's competitors' average revenue growth of 5.4 %, achieved in the same quarter.
Icahn Enterprises l p , despite income growth by most of its competitors recorded a net loss, despite income increase by most of its competitors of 8.86 %
Icahn Enterprises L P 's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The global vehicular parts business is highly competitive. Federal-Mogul competes
with many independent manufacturers and distributors of component parts globally.
In general, competition for sales is based on price, product quality, technology,
delivery, customer service and the breadth of products offered by a given supplier.
Federal-Mogul is meeting these competitive challenges by developing leading technologies,
efficiently integrating and expanding its manufacturing and distribution operations,
widening its product coverage within its core businesses, restructuring its operations
and transferring production to best cost countries, and utilizing its worldwide
technical centers to develop and provide value-added solutions to its customers.
A summary of Federal-Moguls primary independent competitors by its businesses
is set forth below.
Powertrain. Primary competitors include AGM Automotive, Art Metal, Bergmann, BinZou,
Bleistahl, Bosch, Daido, Dana, Dana-Reinz, Delfingen, Denso, DongYang, ElringKlinger,
FNOK, Freudenberg, Kaco/Sabo, Kolbenschmidt, Mahle, Miba, NGK, NOK, NPR, Relats,
Sinteron, SKF, Taiho, and Vitrica.
Motorparts. Primary competitors include Akebono Brake Corporation, Autolite, Brake
Parts Inc., Bosch Group, Centric Parts, Crowne Group LLC, Delphi Automotive LLP,
Denso Corporation, Dorman Products, Inc., GRI Engineering and Development LLC
(MAT Holdings, Inc.), Mahle GmbH, Mevotech Inc., NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd., NTN
Bearing Corporation, Neapco Inc., Old World Industries, LLC, Phillips Industries,
Pylon Manufacturing Corporation, Rain-X (ITW Global Brands), SKF Group, Osram
Sylvania Ltd., The Timken Company, Valeo Group, Dana Corporation (Victor Reinz
brand), and ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
IEH Auto and Pep Boys operate in a highly competitive environment. IEH Auto
and Pep Boys encounter competition from national and regional chains, automotive
dealerships and from local independent service providers and merchants.
The petroleum business competes primarily on the basis of price, reliability
of supply, availability of multiple grades of products and location. The principal
competitive factors affecting its refining operations are cost of crude oil
and other feedstock costs, refinery complexity, refinery efficiency, refinery
product mix and product distribution and transportation costs. The location
of the refineries provides the petroleum business with a reliable supply of
crude oil and a transportation cost advantage over its competitors. The petroleum
business primarily competes against five refineries operated in the mid-continent
region. In addition to these refineries, the refineries compete against trading
companies, as well as other refineries located outside the region that are linked
to the mid-continent market through an extensive product pipeline system. These
competitors include refineries located near the Gulf Coast and the Texas panhandle
region. The petroleum business refinery competition also includes branded, integrated
and independent oil refining companies, such as Phillips 66 Company, HollyFrontier
Corporation, CHS Inc., Valero Energy Corporation and Flint Hills Resources LLC.
The nitrogen fertilizer business has experienced and expect to continue to
meet significant levels of competition from current and potential competitors,
many of whom have significantly greater financial and other resources. Competition
in the nitrogen fertilizer industry is dominated by price considerations. However,
during the spring and fall application seasons, farming activities intensify
and delivery capacity is a significant competitive factor. The nitrogen fertilizer
business maintains a large fleet of leased and owned railcars and seasonally
adjusts inventory to enhance its manufacturing and distribution operations.
The nitrogen fertilizer business major competitors include Agrium, Inc.; CF
Industries Holdings, Inc., including its majority owned subsidiary Terra Nitrogen
Company, LP.; Koch Nitrogen Company, LLC; and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan,
Inc. Domestic competition is intense due to customers sophisticated buying
tendencies and competitor strategies that focus on cost and service. The nitrogen
fertilizer business also encounters competition from producers of fertilizer
products manufactured in foreign countries. In certain cases, foreign producers
of fertilizer who export to the United States may be subsidized by their respective
governments.
The North American railcar manufacturing industry has historically been extremely
competitive. ARI competes primarily with Trinity Industries, Inc. ("Trinity"),
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., National Steel Car Limited, FreightCar America
Inc. and Union Tank Car Company ("Union Tank"). Competitors have expanded
and may continue to expand their capabilities in ARIs core railcar markets.
The railcar leasing industry has also historically been extremely competitive.
Both ARI and ARL compete primarily with Wells Fargo Rail Corp., GATX Corp.,
CIT Group, Trinity and Union Tank in the railcar leasing market.
Our Gaming segment owns land-based and riverboat casino facilities in six states
and one hotel, timeshare and casino resort located on the island of Aruba. Our
Gaming segment competes with numerous casinos and casino hotels of varying quality
and size in the markets in which its properties are located and with other forms
of legalized gaming, including internet gaming, state-sponsored lotteries, racetracks,
off-track wagering, video lottery, video poker terminals and card parlors. Our
Gaming segment also competes with other non-gaming resorts and vacation areas,
and with various other entertainment businesses. The casino entertainment business
is characterized by competitors that vary considerably by their size, quality
of facilities, number of operations, brand identities, marketing and growth
strategies, financial strength and capabilities, level of amenities, management
talent and geographic diversity.
In most markets, our Gaming segment competes directly with other casino facilities
operating in the immediate and surrounding market areas, including casinos located
on Native American reservations. In some markets, our Gaming segment faces competition
from nearby markets in addition to direct competition within its market areas.
Our Gaming segment believes competition in existing markets has intensified
over the last several years, due to new markets opening for development, new
properties opening in existing markets, and challenging economic conditions
in certain markets. Many casino operators have invested in expanding existing
facilities, developing new facilities, and acquiring established facilities
in existing markets. The expansion of casino entertainment at existing properties,
the increase in the number of properties and the aggressive marketing strategies
of many of our competitors has increased competition in many markets in which
our Gaming segment competes, and it expects this intense competition to continue.
Our Gaming segments operating results can be adversely affected by costs associated
with advertising, promotions and complimentary services to patrons, the amount
and timing of which may be affected by the advertising and complimentary policies
and actions of its properties competitors and its efforts to keep pace with
them. If our Gaming segments operating revenues are insufficient to allow it
to match the promotions of competitors, the number of its casino patrons may
decline, which may have a material adverse effect on our Gaming segments financial
performance. In addition, some of Gaming segments competitors have significantly
greater financial resources than it does, and as a result our Gaming segment
may not be able to successfully compete with them in the future.
The home fashion industry is fragmented and highly competitive. Future success
will, to a large extent, depend on WPHs ability to be a competitive low-cost
producer. WPH competes with both foreign and domestic companies on, among other
factors, the basis of price, quality, design and customer service. WPH may also
face competition in the future from companies that are currently third-party
suppliers to WPH. Future success depends on the ability to remain competitive
in the areas of marketing, product development, price, quality, brand names,
manufacturing capabilities, distribution and order processing.
Overall company sales advanced by 18.16 % Icahn Enterprises L P outperformed its competitors in this segment and improved market share, to approx. 0.67 %. << More on IEP Market Share.
*Market share is calculated based on total revenue.
Exxon Mobil Corporation operates as a multinational oil and gas company, involved in the full spectrum of the industry, including upstream exploration and production, midstream transportation, and downstream refining and marketing of petroleum products globally. The company focuses on optimizing its operations to enhance efficiency and sustainability across its diverse portfolio.
OReilly Automotive Inc. operates as a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts, tools, supplies, equipment, and accessories, serving both professional service providers and do-it-yourself customers. The company utilizes a multi-channel business model, combining a widespread network of retail stores, an e-commerce platform, and a dedicated professional sales team to effectively meet diverse customer needs.
Oneok Inc operates as a midstream service provider in the energy sector, focusing on the gathering, processing, transportation, and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids. The company utilizes an integrated network of pipelines and processing facilities to ensure the efficient movement of energy resources from production sites to end-users. Oneok generates revenue by charging fees for its services, which are based on the volume of resources transported and processed within its infrastructure.
Enpro Industries Inc operates through a diversified business model, focusing on engineering and manufacturing high-performance industrial products across various sectors.
Sources:
Icahn Enterprises l p’s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com’s market research; and the financial filings and press releases of other companies cited in this report.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies.
For your research, we’ve provided 10 tables on Icahn Enterprises l p versus competitors, including market share analysis.
You can find them in the navigation menu under Competition.
To download the tables, please subscribe.
Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. All quotes are in local exchange time. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and other exchanges. Fundamental and financial data for Stocks, Sector, Industry, and Economic Indicators provided by CSIMarket.com
Disclaimer: Information provided by CSIMarket.com is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any security.