U S Global Investors Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of U S Global Investors Inc (GROW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: U S Global Investors Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 15M vs 1,092,790M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-26.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: U S Global Investors Inc generated 7.6% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2026, vs 10.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -10.4% net margin compares with 26.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: U S Global Investors Inc ranks #81 of 91 companies by market capitalization in the Investment Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: U S Global Investors Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.70M compares with $0.74M for the peer group (0.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
GROW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
U S Global Investors Inc reported revenue growth of 7.57 % year on year in Q4 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.45 %.
With a net margin of -10.38 %, U S Global Investors Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (26.92 %).
U S Global Investors Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
U S Global Investors Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across U S Global Investors Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across U S Global Investors Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Investment Services industry grew revenue -2.0% year over year, combined, vs 7.6% for U S Global Investors Inc. U S Global Investors Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
U S Global Investors Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (81) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
GROW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
GROW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
GROW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wisdomtree Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Oppenheimer Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Virtu Financial inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Financial Institutions Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for U S Global Investors Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
U S Global Investors Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The mutual fund industry is highly competitive. According to the Investment
Company Institute, at the end of 2014 there were approximately 9,300 domestically
registered open-end investment companies of varying sizes and investment policies,
whose shares are being offered to the public worldwide. Generally, there are
two types of mutual funds: “load” and “no-load.” In
addition, there are both load and no-load funds that have adopted Rule 12b-1
plans authorizing the payment of distribution costs of the funds out of fund
assets. USGIF is a trust with no-load funds that have adopted 12b-1 plans. Load
funds are typically sold through or sponsored by brokerage firms, and a sales
commission is charged on the amount of the investment. No-load funds, such as
the USGIF, however, may be purchased directly from the particular mutual fund
organization or through a distributor, and no sales commissions are charged.
In addition to competition from other mutual fund managers and investment advisers,
the Company and the mutual fund industry are in competition with various investment
alternatives, offered by insurance companies, banks, securities broker-dealers,
other financial institutions, and ETFs. ETFs have had a significant impact on
the industry in the past decade, growing from nearly nothing to approximately
1,500 ETFs available at the end of 2014. Many of these institutions are able
to engage in more liberal advertising than mutual funds and may offer accounts
at competitive interest rates, which may be insured by federally chartered corporations
such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
A number of mutual fund groups are significantly larger than the funds managed
by U.S. Global, offer a greater variety of investment objectives and have more
experience and greater resources to promote the sale of investments therein.
However, the Company believes it has the resources, products, and personnel
to compete with these other mutual funds. In particular, the Company is known
for its expertise in the gold mining and exploration, natural resources and
emerging markets. Competition for sales of fund shares is influenced by various
factors, including investment objectives and performance, advertising and sales
promotional efforts, distribution channels, and the types and quality of services
offered to fund shareholders.
Success in the investment advisory and mutual fund distribution businesses is
substantially dependent on each fund’s investment performance, the quality
of services provided to shareholders, and the Company’s efforts to market
the Funds effectively. Sales of Fund shares generate management, distribution
and administrative services fees (which are based on the assets of the Funds),
and shareholder services fees (which are based on the assets of the Funds held
through institutions). Costs of distribution and compliance continue to put
pressure on profit margins for the mutual fund industry.
Despite the Company’s expertise in gold mining and exploration, natural
resources, and emerging markets, the Company faces the same obstacle many advisers
face, namely uncovering undervalued investment opportunities as the markets
face further uncertainty and increased volatility. In addition, the growing
number of alternative investments, especially in specialized areas, has created
pressure on the profit margins and increased competition for available investment
opportunities.
Supervision and Regulation
Publicly Traded Peers of U S Global Investors Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | 38.40 | 14.73 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 911,205.38 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,281.04 | 121,098.00 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,758.40 | 68,350.00 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 278,809.71 | 52,259.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,842.75 | 83,940.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 3,522,216.01 | 1,230,714.86 |
Sign in to see all competitors of U S Global Investors Inc.
Sources: U S Global Investors Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on U S Global Investors Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
U S Global Investors Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Global | Named by the company | 85% |
| Financial Institutions Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for U S Global Investors Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
U S Global Investors Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | Investment Management Services 62.39 % |
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| Apollo Global Management Inc | Retirement Services 36.50 % |
| Prudential Financial Inc | Total Reconciling Items 1.88 % |
| American International Group Inc | North America Operating 30.08 % |
| The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | P&C Business Insurance 55.32 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
U S Global Investors Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | 38 | 701,571 | 145,476 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 911,205 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,281 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,758 | 823,494 | 245,422 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 278,810 | 1,102,511 | 442,468 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,843 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 3,522,178 | 740,350 | 165,130 |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
U S Global Investors Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Blackrock Inc | Americas 64.41 % |
| Franklin Resources Inc | United States 72.53 % |
| Up Fintech Holding Limited | NZ 35.88 % |
| Stifel Financial Corp | Americas 55.21 % |
| Stonex Group Inc | Middle East and Asia 90.47 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
U S Global Investors Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 88 companies in U S Global Investors Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.U S Global Investors Inc ranks #81 of 88 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 604, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan Stanley | 303,758 | 13.28 % |
| 2 | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 278,810 | 12.19 % |
| 3 | Blackrock Inc | 176,193 | 7.70 % |
| 4 | Schwab Charles Corp | 171,415 | 7.49 % |
| 5 | Futu Holdings Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Robinhood Markets Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Cme Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Blackstone Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Kkr and co inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 81 | U S Global Investors Inc | 38 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of U S Global Investors Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
U S Global Investors Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | Hennessy Advisors Inc | 80 | -7.61 % |
| 77 | Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc | 80 | -34.37 % |
| 78 | Cohen and Co Inc | 61 | -11.13 % |
| 79 | Aikido Pharma Inc | 56 | -63.89 % |
| 80 | Mount Logan Capital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 81 | U S Global Investors Inc | 38 | 12.51 % |
| 82 | Plutus Financial Group Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 83 | Ebang International Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 84 | Lion Group Holding Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 85 | Wright Investors Service Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 86 | Morgan Group Holding Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of U S Global Investors Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
U S Global Investors Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Investment Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (78 companies). See the full Investment Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 61.67 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -4.09 % | industry median | -40.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 28.31 % | 19.52 % (avg) | +8.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 2.93 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
U S Global Investors Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Investment Services industry average (78 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Investment Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.9x | 23.9x | -12.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.1x | 12.8x | -12.7x |
| P/B | 0.8x | 3.0x | -2.2x |
| Return on Equity | 6.70 % | industry aggregate | -9.14 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.65 % | 8.46 % (avg) | -9.11 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
U S Global Investors Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -95.51 % | -282.35 % | - | -1.92 % | -63.76 % | 28.01 % | -22.75 % | 6.97 % |
| Operating Margin | -953.21 % | 581.77 % | 6.14 % | 33.64 % | 25.96 % | 13.14 % | -9.13 % | -13.74 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -13.13 % | -19.04 % | 4.82 % | 9.91 % | 2.88 % | 1.96 % | -1.10 % | -1.90 % |
| P/E | - | - | 3.6x | 4.2x | - | 12.5x | - | 403.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
U S Global Investors Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in U S Global Investors Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. U S Global Investors Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
U S Global Investors Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs U S Global Investors Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
U S Global Investors Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
U S Global Investors Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 604 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See U S Global Investors Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See U S Global Investors Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
U S Global Investors Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
U S Global Investors Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
U S Global Investors Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 40.2 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 9.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-26.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
U S Global Investors Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | 13.31 | 20.41 | 0.00 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Morgan Stanley | 0.40 | 1.12 | 3.16 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 0.50 | 0.79 | 3.11 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
U S Global Investors Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.6 % | - |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | -30.6 % | +58.1 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -65.3 % | +78.0 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.5 % | +36.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
U S Global Investors Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +1,900.0 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | - | +7.3 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -73.4 % | +5.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
U S Global Investors Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | 6.30% | 6.55% | 6.70% |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Morgan Stanley | 1.35% | 1.95% | 17.85% |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 1.07% | 1.86% | 16.95% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
U S Global Investors Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| U S Global Investors Inc | 11.64 | 2.61 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.24 | 4.89 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.77 | 3.34 |
| Morgan Stanley | 15.66 | 4.44 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 14.16 | 5.34 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.83 | 2.96 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 12.83 | 2.86 |
Sign in to see all peers for U S Global Investors Inc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.