Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Espey Mfg And Electronics's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Espey Mfg And Electronics (ESP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
40.39 %
Q4 2026
Net Margin
24.79 %
Q4 2026

Key Findings: Espey Mfg And Electronics vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 46M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+16.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Espey Mfg And Electronics ranks #40 of 71 companies by market capitalization in the IT Infrastructure industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Espey Mfg And Electronics accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ESP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026

Espey Mfg And Electronics generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ESP/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ESP/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ESP/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the IT Infrastructure industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs 40.4% for Espey Mfg And Electronics. Espey Mfg And Electronics's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Espey Mfg And Electronics's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Espey Mfg and Electronics Corp Yes Yes No No
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40% 70% 60% 25%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2026

100%market share
  • Espey Mfg And Electronics100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Espey Mfg And Electronics and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Espey Mfg And Electronics's full market share breakdown »

ESP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ESP Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Espey Mfg And Electronics's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(6 of 10)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 8)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Espey Mfg and Electronics Corp 70.80 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Espey Mfg And Electronics's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ESP Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

ESP Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

ESP Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

ESP Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Espey Mfg And Electronics's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

There is competition in all classes of products manufactured by the Company from divisions of the largest electronic companies, as well as many small companies. The Companys sales do not represent a significant share of the industrys market for any class of its products. The principal methods of competition for electronic products of both a military and industrial nature include, among other factors, price, product performance, the experience of the particular company and history of its dealings in such products.

Our business is not seasonal. However, the concentration of our business in equipment for military applications and our customer concentrations expose us to on-going associated risks including, without limitation, dependence on appropriations from the United States Government and the governments of foreign nations, program allocations, and the potential of governmental termination of orders for convenience.

Uncertainty in federal defense spending continues to drive competition in the industry. Based upon discussions during contract negotiations with our major customers over the past several years, we believe that many of our competitors have been aggressively investing in upfront product design costs and lowering profit margins as a strategic means of maintaining existing business and enhancing market share at the expense of short term profit. This change in the market place has put pressure on the pricing of our current products and will result in lower margins on new business and some of our legacy business. In order to compete effectively for new business, in some cases we invest in upfront design costs, thereby reducing initial profitability as a means of procuring new long-term programs. Accordingly, we have adjusted our pricing strategy in order to achieve a balance which enables us both to retain repeat programs while being more competitive in bidding on new programs.